Home Today's Paper Most Popular Video Gallery Photo Gallery
Subscription Blog Signin Register
Logo
Wednesday, June 20, 2018 09:10:46 PM
Follow Us On: Facebook Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter

16th Amendment Case : A Judgment on Supremacy

By
09th-Sep-2017       
Comments
Share your thought
Post a comment »
Read all () »

Barrister M Qaium :
Appellate Division by its historic judgment on July 3rd 2017 upheld the judgment of the High Court Division dated 05.05.2016 striking down the 16th Amendment of the Constitution as unconstitutional. By 16th Amendment of the Constitution, Parliament assumed the removal power of the judges of the Supreme Court which was earlier dealt with by the Supreme Judicial Council.
People mostly concludes that the moot question was raised and settled in this case was 'whether the constitutional 16th Amendment has violated the basic structure of the constitution and thus void, illegal and unconstitutional being against the spirit of principle of separation of judiciary and its independence. People's concern was if the removal mechanism of the judges of the Supreme Court is given to the Parliament, whether the independence of the judiciary will be affected and/or hampered. Our Apex Court by its wisdom unanimously held that 16th Amendment of the Constitution is void, illegal and unconstitutional.  In doing so, the Apex Court necessarily discussed the events taken place in our political history of last seven decades (1947-2014) in general and 1971-2016 in particular in order to justify its verdict for protection of the independence of judiciary from the influence of other organs.
Judgment of the 16th Amendment case has reminded us all once again of the facts that we, the Peoples of Bangladesh, have chosen ourselves a 'written constitution' unlike West Minister form of democracy. Modern constitution is essentially a written constitution which can put a "balanced restriction" on unfettered, despotic and totalitarian power of the executive so that it cannot transgress the limit prescribed. Court gave us all a reminder that about a very simple fact that: Bangladesh has a 'written' constitution. Having a 'written' constitution means nothing but having a power to exercise, that power is essentially restricted in the sense that it is not unfettered or unlimited, and it is balanced in the sense that while exercising that power, all State organs shall not work in isolation rather they will combine their efforts together so that maximum benefits to the people are ensured.
I see this judgment from a different perspective. The issue of supremacy was brought into light and settled by the Apex Court though not much talked about. Some politicians, intellects and jurists borrowed the West Ministerial idea that parliament as representative of the people is supreme over other organs of the state. The apex court through this judgment has buried this idea of supremacy of Parliament and affirmed in its own language that "only people are sovereign and only the Constitution is supreme".
The idea of supremacy of the Parliament has never been a Bangladeshi one. It was originated in England in 1688 by reducing crowns prerogative powers; the supremacy of parliament was established. Since then legal sovereignty remains with the Parliament of United Kingdom. The British Parliament exercises sovereign legislative power, it has unfettered rights to make and unmake any laws. It is said that British Parliament can do anything except make a man woman and a woman a man. We must however be mindful of the facts that UK does not have an absolutely written constitution prescribing limit of the powers and authority of different organs; in contrast Bangladesh essentially has a written constitution. In a written constitution powers of the different organs of the state are prescribed and limited. No one or authorities under a written constitution will exercise their power/authorities beyond limit prescribed. In the judgment Supreme Court observed that "There is a misconception about the Parliamentary sovereignty or legislative privilege in a written constitution". Supreme Court went on to say that "only the people are sovereign and only the Constitution is supreme. All other institutions are merely the instruments or agencies to fulfill the greatest purposes enunciated in the Constitution. Our Constitution envisages not only a democracy of men but a democracy of institutions. The attributes of sovereign authority or unlimited power do not attach to any office or any institution. To claim sovereignty for the Legislature is directly contrary to the law...." Article 7 (1) of our Constitution clearly expressed that "All powers in the Republic belong to the, and their exercise on behalf of the people shall be effected only under, and by the authority of, this Constitution". No organ can claim supremacy over any other organs. When the Judiciary declares any law enacted by the Legislature to be unconstitutional, the Judiciary is not exercising any superior power, nor does it claim supremacy over parliament but simply acting in line with its constitutional obligation.
The written constitution of Bangladesh has placed Supreme Court in the position of the Guardian of our Constitution itself. Supreme Court will not therefore accept imposition of any inroad upon the Constitution. The criticism of Supreme Court from the politician legislature and executive is unfortunate as constitution itself envisages for exercise of such judicial review power by the Supreme Court. Supreme Court has just merely performed its constitutional sacred duty which Supreme Court bound to under the  constitution.
Following the judgment given in 16th Amendment Case it may be pertinent to discuss whether the Parliament may pass an Amendment of the Constitution or any legislation which is being struck down by the Apex Court as void and unconstitutional. Article 112 of the Constitution provides, all authorities, whether executive and judicial, in the Republic shall act in aid of the Supreme Court and from this point of view, the Parliament can not make any law by passing the binding effect of the judgment rendered by the Appellate Division. The Supreme Court of India in People's Union For Civil Liberties (PUCL) case held that 'the Legislature has no power to review the decision and set it at naught except by removing the defect which is the cause pointed out by the decision rendered by the Court and if this is permitted, it would sound the death knell of the rule of law'. The Legislature can not overrule or supersede a judgment of the Court except lawfully removing the defect or infirmity pointed out by the Court.
(Writer is a Barrister-at-Law of the Honourable Society of Grays Inn and Advocate, Supreme Court of Bangladesh. abdulqaium85@gmail.com)

Tariff
Add Rate

News Archive

Inside The New Nation

Editorial »

Death of another prosecution witness : Too difficult to accept as an accident


NO sooner had the Eid vacation come to an end but another murder shocked us all. The decapitated body of Sumon Zahid, a witness in a war crimes case and also the son of martyred journalist Selina Parvin was found dead in the capital's Khilgaon the day before yesterday. There ...

Business & Economy »

A delegation headed by Farzana Chowdhury, CEO of Green Delta Insurance makes a courtesy call with Dr. M Khairul Hossain, the newly appointed Chairman of Security Exchange Commission recently. Additional Managing Director and Company Secretary Syed Moinuddin Ahmed and Deputy Managing Director Wafi S M Khan of the company were also present.


Football »

England beat Tunisia 2-1


AFP, Volgograd :Captain Harry Kane came to the rescue with two goals, the second a dramatic injury-time winner, as England began their World Cup Group G campaign with a stuttering 2-1 win over Tunisia on Monday.  Gareth Southgate's men almost paid a heavy price for missing a slew of first-half ...

Football »

Harry Kane : England's new prince


AFP, Volgograd :Harry Kane rose emphatically to the World Cup challenge in England's opening match against Tunisia, scoring a last-gasp winner to give Gareth Southgate's side lift-off in Russia.It was a remarkable World Cup debut for Kane, who bore the added pressure of the captain's armband and the weight of ...

Entertainment »

I`m indebted to J.P. Dutta for life : Pooja Bhatt


Actress-filmmaker Pooja Bhatt said she is indebted to veteran director J.P. Dutta for not only making her a part of 'Border' but also for encouraging her to never change. 'Border' on Wednesday completed 21 years of its release and Pooja took to Twitter to thank Dutta for casting her in ...

International »

US won`t be made a migrant camp


President Donald Trump vowed on Monday that the United States would not become a "migrant camp" as he faced mounting pressure to stop families being separated as a deterrent to illegal immigration."The United States will not be a migrant camp, and it will not be a refugee holding facility," Trump ...

City »

Pedestrians passing through a muddy road as the authority concerned does not repair the road for long time. The snap was taken from Bibir Bagicha area in the city's Jatrabari on Tuesday.


Editorial »

Save the flood victims and take adequate measures for post-flood rehabilitation


INCESSANT rainfall in the last few days has triggered floods in the country's East and South East districts. Thousands of people of Moulvibazar, Habiganj, Feni and Chattogram districts have been marooned as floodwater crawled to inundate their homestead and damage crops and livestock. The New Nation recently reported that Khowai, ...

Football »

A Mexico soccer fan celebrates her team victory against Germany after their group F match at the 2018 soccer World Cup in the Luzhniki Stadium in Moscow, Russia on Sunday.


Sports »

Federer wins 98th ATP title in Stuttgart


AFP, Germany :Roger Federer claimed his 98th ATP title on Sunday with a 6-4, 7-6 (7/3) defeat of Milos Raonic in the grass-court Stuttgart Cup final.The Swiss great, who will be chasing a ninth Wimbledon triumph next month, beat his Canadian opponent for the 11th time in 14 meetings while ...

International »

US policy on migrant kids `unconscionable`: UN rights chief


AP, Geneva :The U.N. human rights chief is urging the Trump administration to end new policies separating migrant children from their parents after entering the United States from Mexico, saying they've affected nearly 2,000 kids in the last six weeks.Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein says it's "unconscionable" that any country would seek ...

International »

Family separation policy starts dividing Republicans


AP, Washington :The emotional policy of separating children from their parents is also starting to divide Republicans and their allies as Democrats turn up the pressure.Former first lady Laura Bush called the policy "cruel" and "immoral" while GOP Sen. Susan Collins expressed concern about it and a former adviser to ...

City »

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina exchanging pleasantries with diplomats at Ganabhaban in the city on Saturday on the occasion of holy Eid-ul-Fitr.


Editorial »

Eid Mubarak


EID UL FITR is an important religious event celebrated by Muslims worldwide that marks the end of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting (sawm). The Eid (Muslim religious festival) is the first and only day in the month of Shawal during which Muslims are not permitted to fast. The ...

Cricket »

History-making Afghanistan get baptism of fire in Test cricket


AFP, Bangalore :Afghanistan were handed a bruising introduction to Test cricket by India on Thursday as they capped their astonishing rise from war and refugee camps to joining the sport's elite.Afghan skipper Asghar Stanikzai called it a "very proud moment" as he strode onto the field at Bangalore's M. Chinnaswamy ...

 
Items that you save may be read at any time on your computer, iPad, iPhone or Android devices.
 
Are you new to our website? Do you have already an account at our website?
Create An Account Log in here
Email this news to a friend or like someone
Email:
Write a comment to this news