Home Today's Paper Most Popular Video Gallery Photo Gallery
Subscription Blog Signin Register
Logo
Monday, December 17, 2018 10:03:44 PM
Follow Us On: Facebook Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter

Preliminary decree is not absolute

By
23rd-Dec-2017       
Comments
Share your thought
Post a comment »
Read all () »

Appellate Division :
(Civil)
Md Abdul Wahhab Miah J
Nazmun Ara Sultana J
Masum Billah (Md) and another.......Petitions
vs
Md Saidur Rahman and others............Respondents
Judgment
July 3rd, 2017
Code of Civil Procedure (v of o 1908)
Section 144 and
Order IX, Rule 13
Mere passing of a final decree and its execution thereof shall not debar a defendant to file an application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code if, in fact, summons were not served upon him and he was affected by the very preliminary decree.
The High Court Division was also oblivious of the provisions of Section 144 of the Code which clearly entitles a party to pray for restoration of possession even if the possession is delivered pursuant a decree passed in a suit. It also failed to consider that the preliminary decree having been set aside, the suit was heard afresh and the parties participated in the hearing and produced evidence and then the suit having been disposed of on merit, there was no bar to pass afresh final decree and, as such, the High Court Division was obliged to dispose of the revision on merit in the context of the judgment and decree impugned before it, but it did not and thereby committed serious error of law in passing the impugned judgment and order and, as such, the same cannot be sustained. .......9 & 10
Venkta Reddy vs Pothi, AIR 1963 (SC) 992 and Sadar uddin vs Jaharlal, AIR 1942 Cal-153 ref.
Abdul Wadud Bhuiya, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahmanb, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners.
Quamrul Hoque Siddique, Advocate instructed by Haridas paul, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1(a), 4(b), 4(d), 5-6, 7(a)-7(d), 8,9(a), 9(c) -9(d) & 17.
None Represented -Respondent Nos.1(b)-1(g), 2-3, 4(a), 4(c), 4(e), 7(e)-7(h), 9(b), 9(e), 10-16 & 18-244.
Judgment
Md Abdul Wahhab Miah J :  This civil petition for leave to appeal has been filed by 2 (two) of the defendants, namely, Md Masum Billah, son of late Yakub Ali and Abul Hashem, son of Munshi Abdul Gani (number of the defendants are not available from the record) against the judgment and order dated the 12th day of January, 2016 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.6086 of 2002 making the Rule absolute.
2. Facts necessary to dispose this petition are that predecessor-interest of respondent Nos, l(a)-1(g), respondent Nos. 2 and 3, predecessor-in-interest of respondent. Nos.4(a)-4(e), respondent Nos. 5 and 6, predecessor-in-interest of respondent Nos. 7(a)-7(h), respondents No.8, predecessor-in-interest of respondent Nos.9(a)9(e) and respondent Nos. 10-18 herein as the plaintiffs filed Title Suit No . .164 of 1973 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Court No:2, Barisal for partition of the suit land Subsequently, the suit having been transferred to the Court of Assistant Judge, Banaripara, BarisaI was renumbered as Title Suit No. 169, of 1984.
3. The suit was decreed on 30-6-1987 in preliminary form against the contesting defendants as well as the other non-contesting defendants. Against the said decree, defendant No. 176 filed an application under Order IX, rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the said decree. The application was registered as Miscellaneous Case No.4) of 1989. This miscellaneous case was allowed by the learned Assistant Judge by his order dated 18-1-1995 in the following terms:
অতএব,
হুমুক হইল যে,
অত্র মোকদ্দমাটি তরপছানীদের বিরুদ্ধে একতরফ সূত্রে ১,০০০ টাকা খরচায় মঞ্জুর করা হইল। বিগত ইং ৩০-৬-৮৭ তারিখের প্রচারিত ডিক্রী রদ ও রহিতান্তে মূল মোকদ্দমা উহার পূর্বের নম্বরে ও ফাইলে পূনর্বহাল করা হইল।”
4. Thus, it is clear that 'the decree passed in  the suit was set aside as a whole. Therefore, the decree passed in the suit. on 30-8-1987 became non-existent. It further appears that after the suit was restored to its original file and number, the same was contested by defendant Nos. 3 and 15 by filing written statement and on conclusion of trial, the learned Senior Assistant Judge by his judgment and decree dated 28-5-1998 dismissed the suit. Against the judgment and decree of the learned Senior Assistant Judge, the plaintiffs filed Title Appeal No: 130 of 1998 before the District Judge, Barisal. The learned Additional District Judge, 1st Court, Barisal having heard the appeal by his judgment and decree dated 23-5-2002 dismissed the appeal and thus affirmed the judgment and decree of the learned Assistant Judge. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge, the plaintiffs filed the above mentioned civil revision before the High Court Division. A Single Bench by the impugned judgment and order made the Rule absolute and set aside the judgment and decree complained of; hence this petition for leave to appeal.
5. Heard Mr Abdul Wadud Bhuiya, learned Counsel for the. petitioners and Mr Quamrul Hoque Siddique, learned Counsel who entered caveat on behalf of respondent Nos. l(a), 4(b), 4(d), 5-6, 7(a)- 7(d), 8, 9(a), 9(c)-9(d) and 178.
6. From the revision application, it is prima facie clear that the judgment and decree impugned therein was the judgment and decree of the Appellate Court passed in Title Appeal No. 130 of 1998 affirming those dated 28-5-1998 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Banaripara in the suit being Title Suit No. 169 of 1984 after the same had been restored to its original file and number. But the High Court Division without considering the legal flaws in the judgment of the Courts below passed in the suit and in the appeal respectively, devoted its whole energy on the legality of the, order passed in Miscellaneous Case No.43 of 1989 setting aside the decree passed on 30-6-1987; as if it were a revision preferred against the order allowing the said miscellaneous case. We consider it better to quote the entire findings of the High Court Division which is as under:
"I have considered the question raised that whether, after final decree having been executed on satisfaction, the decree of a partition suit can be set aside by laying application under Order IX, rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This suit was for partition in which it is to be settled (sic) whether a party has saham or share of land. It appears out of 202 defendants, at the instance of single defendant, entire decree as been set aside. Partition suit is different from other suits. In partition suit share of land was allowed to plaintiff or defendant as per their individual saham.
In setting aside any exparte decree, the applicant must disclose (sic) the impugned exparte decree how he is effected ie whether (sic) his share of land crept up from his saham has been allotted to other. Omnibus statement for setting aside exparte decree does not hold good. It can be set aside in respect of saham of which applicant defendant is entitled. It appears that defendant No. 176 stated that entire judgment was obtained by practising fraud. This is not correct as when other defendants appeared one cannot say that entire judgment was obtained by practising fraud. It is to be borne in mind that defendant Nos. 170-2002 were impleaded by order dated 19-2-1976.
Now, the question put forward by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that if decree having been executed to the satisfaction of all the appeared defendants whether it can be set aside under Order IX rule 13 of the code of civil procedure.
In the case of Venkata Reddy vs Pothi, AIR 1963 (SC) 992 it is held where no appeal has been filed against the preliminary decree, the rights determined therein become final and conclusive and cannot be questioned in the final decree.
In the case of Sadar uddin vs Jaharlal, AIR 1942 Cal-153, it is held when no appeal is preferred against the final decree and only the preliminary decree is appealed against, but a copy of the final decree is placed on record of the appeal, it is the duty' of the appellate court in dealing with the appeal to give necessary' and consequential directions regarding final decree.     
It appears that suit was decreed and decree was satisfied by giving possession of the respective parties, final decree was drawn and possession of the parties have been delivered by advocate commissioner, in such situation, an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure is incompetent, an appeal can be taken. After final decree being satisfied by giving possession to individual saham holder it ended finally, in such a situation application under order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure is totally incompetent and is entertaining the application courts below totally suffer from corum nonjudice. I find substance in this rule."
7. In the context, it is necessary to bring on record a very broad admitted fact that the plaintiffs did not move the higher Court against the order allowing the miscellaneous case, rather they very much participated in the, peremptory hearing of the suit and produced evidence in support of their case after restoration to its file arid number and then they having lost in the suit, filed appeal against the decree of the trial Court. Since the plaintiffs accepted the order passed in the miscellaneous case and participated in the hearing of the suit, they could not challenge the propriety or the, correctness of the order passed in the miscellaneous case in any manner whatsoever in a proceeding which arose out of the decree passed in the suit. Unfortunately, the High Court Division failed to comprehend this simple factual and legal aspect of the case. In the context we consider it necessary to refer to the finding of the learned Senior Assistant Judge in allowing the miscellaneous case which reads as follows;
“ধার্য্য তাং সরকারী ছুটি থাকায় অদ্য নথি মজহর পক্ষের বিগত ইং ১৪-১১-৯৫ তারিখের একতরফা জবান-বন্দীর আলোকে আদেশের জন্য পেশ করা হয়।
ছানীর দরখাস্ত ও নথি পর্যালোচনা করিয়া দেখিলাম। অত্র মোকদ্দমায় বিবাদী পক্ষের প্রতি মূল মোকদ্দমার সমন জারীর বিবরণ সন্তোষজনক নহে বিধায় অত্র মোকদ্দমাটি মঞ্জুর যোগ্য”
8. From the above, it is clear that the summons of the suit was not served upon defendant No. 176 who filed the miscellaneous case for setting aside the decree passed in the suit and the trial Court rightly allowed the same.
9. From the judgment of the High Court Division, it is apparent that it failed to consider the very fundamental fact that the decree which was passed earlier in the suit did not exist, the moment the same was set aside, in the miscellaneous case. The High Court Division also failed to consider that mere passing of a final decree and its execution thereof shall not debar a defendant to file an application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code if, in fact, summons were not served upon him and he was affected by the very preliminary decree. The High Court Division was also wrong in relying upon the principle of law laid down in the cases of' Ven Kata' Reddy (Supra) and Sadaruddin ($upra) in passing the impugned judgment and order, as the facts and circumstances of the instant case were completely different and distinct from those cases.
10. The High Court Division was also oblivious of the provisions of Section 144 of the Code which clearly entitles a party to pray for restoration of possession even if the possession is delivered pursuant to a decree passed in a suit.
It also failed to consider that the preliminary decree having been set aside, the suit was heard afresh and the parties participated in the hearing and produced evidence and then the suit having been disposed of on merit, there was no bar to pass afresh final decree and, as such, the High Court Division was obliged to dispose of the revision on merit in the context of the judgment and decree impugned before it. but it did not and thereby committed serious error of law in passing the impugned judgment and order and, as such, the same cannot be sustained.
11. In view of the above, we find no other alternative but to send the revision back to the High Court Division for hearing afresh and for disposal in accordance with law on the basis of the evidence on record. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in the following terms:
The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. The revision is sent back to the High Court Division for hearing afresh and for disposal on merit in accordance with law considering the evidence.
If so advised, the parties may mention the revision before the competent Bench for early hearing and, if mentioned, the concerned Bench shall hear the same on priority basis.

Tariff
Add Rate

News Archive

Inside The New Nation

Cricket »

Sri Lanka 275-9 at stumps on day 1, 1st Test vs New Zealand


AP, New Zealand :Tim Southee took 5-67 as New Zealand exploited an influential toss to contain Sri Lanka to 275-9 Saturday on the first day of the first cricket Test at the Basin Reserve.A late unbeaten half century by wicketkeeper Niroshan Dickwella helped swing the day a little in Sri ...

Football »

Salah retains BBC African Footballer of the Year award


Liverpool and Egypt striker Mohamed Salah has capped a sparkling 2018 for club and country by winning the prestigious BBC African Footballer of the Year Award for the second time in a row."It's a great feeling to win again. I'm happy and I would like to win it also next ...

Entertainment »

Soundarya Sharma is going to have an exceptional time this festive season


Actress Soundarya Sharma who made her stellar debut in Ranchi Diaries, a Comedy thriller film, and got a thumbs up from the critics and audience and awarded as the ‘Best Debutante’ at Jharkhand international film festival 2018. She was nominated for the ‘Best Female Debutante’ by Zee Cine Awards 2018 ...

Entertainment »

Ishana in four plays under same director’s direction


Sheikh Arif Bulbon :Popular TV actress of present time Ishana Khan has worked in four faction plays under same director's direction. She has finished shooting of these four plays under Satirtho Rahman Rubel’s direction. Shooting of these plays took place in Darjeeling from November last week to December first week. ...

Editorial »

No room for self-satisfaction, success needed in other fields too


THE nation celebrates the 48th Victory Day today amid festivity. Today, the nation will remember its glorious historical achievement earned through a nine-month war against Pakistan Occupation Forces in 1971. The nation will recall today, Bangladesh was born as an independent country under the leadership of Father of the Nation ...

International »

Australia recognises west Jerusalem as capital of Israel


Australia now recognises west Jerusalem as Israel's capital, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said Saturday, but a contentious embassy shift from Tel Aviv will not occur until a peace settlement is achieved.Canberra became one of just a few governments around the world to follow US President Donald Trump's lead and recognise ...

International »

Trump taps budget head Mulvaney as acting chief of staff


Donald Trump announced Friday that his budget director Mick Mulvaney will step in as acting chief of staff to replace John Kelly - amid indications the president is struggling to fill the key post.Trump, whose presidency is increasingly embroiled in legal troubles, announced earlier this month that Kelly, a former ...

City »

BNP candidate of Dhaka-8 constituency Mirza Abbas speaking at a prèss conference at his residence in the city on Saturday in protest against attack on his electioneering in the city's Segunbagicha area.


Entertainment »

Mim`s new movie Thai Curry


Sheikh Arif Bulbon :End of this year is becoming something new for the National Film Award winner actress Bidya Sinha Saha Mim. At the end of this year, she has started shooting of a new movie. Now she is staying in Bangkok to take part in shooting of the movie. ...

Business & Economy »

In presence of Mohammed Monirul Moula, AMD of Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited, Abu Reza Md. Yeahia, DMD of the Bank and Dr. M. Easin Ali, Chairman of Dhaka City Physiotherapy Hospital, exchanging an agreement signing document at the Banks head office in the city on Wednesday. Under the deal, VISA and Khidmah Card holders of the Bank will get attractive discount in treatment services of the Hospital. Top officials from both the organizations were also present.


.

Cricket »

Malinga named captain for ODI, T20I series against New Zealand


Sri Lanka pacer Lasith Malinga, who until recently was out of favour with the selectors, has been appointed as the captain for the upcoming ODI and T20I series against New Zealand. He replaces Dinesh Chandimal, who led the side in the recently concluded ODI series and Thisara Perera, who captained ...

International »

US Senate votes to end support for Saudi-led Yemen war, blasts crown prince


The US Senate dealt President Donald Trump a double blow over Saudi Arabia on Thursday, approving a resolution to end US military support for Riyadh's war in Yemen, and another holding the Saudi crown prince responsible for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.Though largely symbolic, the two bipartisan measures deliver a ...

International »

Islamic State not defeated, just transforming: Experts


Even as the last pockets of resistance in eastern Syria hold their ground, the Islamic State group is shapeshifting into a new, but no less dangerous, underground form, experts warn.Also known as ISIS, or the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, the group had long been ready to cede the ...

Editorial »

Time to avail the golden opportunity to explore Japan`s rich market


BANGLADESH wants to explore the potentials of sending skilled workers to Japan as the country is likely to open its job market for foreign workers. The matter is likely to be raised at Foreign Secretary-level talks scheduled to be held on December 17 in Tokyo.Foreign Secretary M Shahidul Haque and ...

Editorial »

Involve the youths in decision making process


A RECENT survey rightly indicated that unified and quality education system for all is imperative to turn today's youth into skilled manpower for future Bangladesh. Ahead of the 11th National Election, the survey findings clearly echoed the youth voice who emphasised meritorious teacher recruitment at primary school to tertiary level ...

 
Items that you save may be read at any time on your computer, iPad, iPhone or Android devices.
 
Are you new to our website? Do you have already an account at our website?
Create An Account Log in here
Email this news to a friend or like someone
Email:
Write a comment to this news