Home Today's Paper Most Popular Video Gallery Photo Gallery
Subscription Blog Signin Register
Logo
Sunday, August 18, 2019 02:11:41 PM
Follow Us On: Facebook Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter

Ex-parte Decree by Artha Rin Adalat

Section 5 of the Limitation Act will not Apply

By
08th-Jun-2019       
Comments
Share your thought
Post a comment »
Read all () »

(From previous issue) :
8.    'The respondents of the present First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 105 of 2012 without serving any summons or notice or any copy of the said application upon the appellant, (plaintiff of the Artha Rin Suit) the learned Judge, of the Artha Rin Adalat after hearing the defendant only, pleased to allow the Miscellaneous Case on 16-1-2012 by setting aside the exparte decree dated 22-3-2009 and restored the Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008 to its original file and number.
9.    Being aggrieved by the aforesaid impugned order No. 10 dated 16-1-2012 of the Adalat, the plaintiffs as appellants preferred this Miscellaneous Appeal before this Court with an application for stay operation of the impugned order dated 16-1-2012 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, upon which this Court by the order dated 27-2-2012 issued Rule and stayed all further proceedings of Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008 for 3 (three) months and later on the said stay has been extended till disposal of the Rule. The Rule was registered as Civil Rule No. 164 (FM) of 2012.
10.    Mr Ahsanul Karim, the learned Advocate appearing with Mr Khairul Alam Choudhury, Mr Md Kabir Iqbal Hossain and Ms. Farzana Khan, learned Advocates on behalf of the appellants at the very outset submits that the Artha Rin Adalat committed serious error in law in allowing the miscellaneous case in particular that the learned Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat failed to consider that no notice and copy of the application under Section 19(2) of the Ain was served upon the plaintiffs appellants before taking up the said application, for disposal.
11.    He further submits that the learned Judge, failed to discuss a to how the defendant
respondents came to the finding about the knowledge of the respondents about the exparte order dated 22-3--2009, decree signed on 25-3-2009 passed in Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008 without considering any evidence in respect of limitation. In this respect he has drawn out attention to Annexure-F of the application for stay filed by the appellant, from where it is found that the defendant-respondents were very much aware of the decree passed ex-parte in Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008 as far back as at least in 2009 as it is evident that an application under Section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure had been filed before the Hon'ble High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 19420 of 2009 (wherein the present respondents had annexed the exparte decree dated 22-3-2009 (decree signed on 25-3-2009) as Annexure-E in their application under Section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure) which clearly proves that they were well aware of the said ex-parte decree at least in 2009. The respondents claim that they knew nothing about the suit as well as the decree until 1-1-2012 was not correct at all. Therefore, the date of knowledge is clearly more than 30 (thirty) days before filing of the application under Section 19(2) of the Artha Rin Adalat 2003, which is hopelessly barred by special law of limitation laid down in Section 19 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003.
12.     He next submits that without ascertaining the question of limitation, the learned Judge, having satisfied himself of compliance of only one requirement of deposit of 10% of the decreetal amount erroneously allowed the Miscellaneous Case without satisfying himself that the said application was not indeed filed within 30 days from the date of knowledge of the defendant-respondents and as such the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law and required to be set aside.
13.    In support of his submissions, he referred 2 (two) decisions, Bangladesh Development Bank Ltd vs Judge Artha Rin Adalat, Jessore reported in 66 DLR 1; and Pubali Bank Ltd vs Bangladesh reported in 66 DLR 317.
14.    Furthermore, he submits that the suppression of facts amounts to fraud upon the Court and fraud vitiates everything and he is not entitled to get any relief due to this suppression of facts. Accordingly, he prayed for allowing the Appeal.
15. On the other hand, Mr Md Reza-e-Murshed Kamal, the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents by filing an affidavit-in-opposition and Counter- Affidavit, contesting the Appea1 and submits that the facts of the case of the respondent opposite parties No.1 to 3 are that they never applied for any loan in the said Bank rather one Mahbubur Rahman a Bank staff misguided the respondent opposite-parties and provoked them to apply for loan.
16.    He next submits that the present respondents did not know about the judgment and decree passed by the 4th Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka in Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008. The respondents came to know firstly from the Criminal Case No. 1089 of 2011 file by the Bank in the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Dhaka under Section 419/420/465/ 467/471/109 of the Penal Code. Wherein an application dated 1-1-2012 has been filed for' 'shown arrest' the accused petitioner and in that application, the number of Artha Rin Execution Case No. 47 of 2011 has been written. Thereafter after knowing about the said ex-parte' order passed in Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008, the present respondents filed Miscellaneous Case No. 01 of 2012 before the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka under Section 1(2) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 for restoration of the original Artha Rin Suit No. 19 of 2008 and the same was allowed and restored the said suit. However the said suit is now stayed by the order of the Hon'ble High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 164 (FM) of 2012 filed by the appellants.
17.    He further submits that the Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008 is totally false, manufactured and the defendants No.1 to 3 are not responsible for the outstanding dues as demanded by the plaintiffs bank and is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for and the order of stay passed by the Hon'ble High Court Division in this Civil Rule is liable to be vacated for the ends of justice.
18.    At the time of hearing, the learned Advocate for the respondents was confronted with the question of date of knowledge of the exparte decree dated 22-3-2009 in particular the application filed by the respondents under Section 561A of Code of Criminal Procedure i.e. regarding Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 19420 of 2009, wherein the respondents annexed the certified copy of the judgment of the ex-parte decree dated 22-3-2009 (decree signed on 25-3-2009) that the respondents had knowledge of the ex-parte decree at least in the year of 2009 and this Suppression of fact, amounts to committing fraud upon the Court. In reply the learned Counsel for the respondents finding himself in difficult position to address the point confronted with and could not give any satisfactory reply to this point of Suppression of facts rather admitted it. However, he finally submits that for the ends of justice, the respondents should be given a last chance to contest the suit.
19.    We have heard the learned Advocates of both the parties with profound attention, peruse the impugned order of the Adalat and the papers and documents as available on the record and the decisions of our Apex Court very carefully.
20.    Now, for the convenience of understanding Section 19 of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 is quoted below:
“১৯। (১) মামলার শুনানীর জন্য ধার্য কোন তারিখে বিবাদী আদালতে অনুপ¯ি'ত থাকিলে, কিংবা মামলা শুনানীর জন্য গ"হীত হইবার পর ডাকিয়া বিবাদীকে উপ¯ি'ত পাওয়া না গেলে, আদালত মামলা একতরফা সূত্রে নিস্পত্তি করিবে।
(২) কোন মামলা একতরফা সূত্রে ডিক্রী হইলে, বিবাদী উক্ত একতরফা ডিক্রীর তারিখে অথবা উক্ত একতরফা ডিক্রী সম্পর্কে অবগত হইবার ৩০ (ত্রিশ) দিবসের মধ্যে, উপ-ধারা (৩) এর বিধান সাপেক্ষে, উক্ত একতরফা  ডিক্রী রদের জন্য দরখাস্ত করিতে পারিবেন।
(৩) উপ-ধারা- (২) এর বিধান অনুযায়ী দরখাস্ত দাখিলের ক্ষেত্রে বিবাদীকে উক্ত দরখাস্ত দাখিলের তারিখের পরবর্তী ১৫ (পনের) দিবসের মধ্যে ডিক্রীকৃত অর্থের ১০% এর সমপরিমাণ টাকা বাদীর দাবীর সেই পরিমাণের জন্য স্বীকৃতিস্বরূপ নগদ সংশ্লিষ্ট আর্থিক প্রতিষ্ঠানে, অথবা জামানতস্বরূপ ব্যাংক ড্রাফট, পে-অডার বা অন্য কোন প্রকার নগদায়নযোগ্য বিনিময়ে দলিল (ঘবমড়ঃরধনষব ওহংঃৎঁসবহঃ) আকারে জামানত হিসাব আদালতে জমাদান করিতে হইবে।
(৪) উপ-ধারা (৩) এর বিধানমতে ডিক্রীকৃত অর্থের ১০% এর সমপরিমান টাকা জমাদানের সংগে সংগে দরখাস্তটি মঞ্জুর হইবে, একতরফা ডিক্রী রদ হইবে এবং মূল মামলা উহার পূর্বের নম্বর ও নথিতে পুনরুজ্জীবিত হইবে, এবং আদালত ঐ মর্মে একটি আদেশ লিপিবদ্ধ করিবে, এবং অতঃপর মামলাটি যে পর্যায়ে একতরফা নিস্পত্তি হইয়াছিল, ঐ পর্যায়ের অব্যবহিত পূর্ববর্তী পর্যায়ে হইতে পরিচালিত হইবে।
(৫) বিবাদী উপ-ধারা (৩) বিধান মতে ডিক্রীকৃত অর্থের ১০% এর সমপরিমাণ টাকা বাদীর সেই পরিমাণের জন্য স্বীকৃতিস্বরূপ নগদ সংশ্লিষ্ট আর্থিক প্রতিষ্ঠান, অথবা জামানতস্বারূপ ব্যাংক ড্রাফট, পে-অর্ডার বা অন্য কোন প্রকার নগদায়নযোগ্য বিনিময়ে দলিল (ঘবমড়ঃরধনষব ওহংঃৎঁসবহঃ ) আকারে জামানত হিসাব আদালতে জমাদান করিতে ব্যর্থ হইলে, উক্ত দরখাস্তটি উক্ত দরখাস্তটি সরাসরি খারিজ হইবে, এবং আদালত ঐ মর্মে একটি আদেশ লিপিবদ্ধ করিবে।
(৬) অর্থ ঋণ আদালতে বিচারাধীন কোন মামলা, বাদীর অনুপ¯ি'তির বা ব্যর্থতা হেতু খারিজ করা যাইবে না, এবং এইরূপ ক্ষেত্রে আদালত, নথিতে উপ¯'াপিত কাগজাদি পরীক্ষা করিয়া গুণাগুণ বিশ্লেষণে মামলা নিষ্পত্তি করিবে।”
21. From the combined reading of the above provisions, it appears that Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 gives a clear understanding that right after passing of the ex-parte decree or from the (date of knowledge of the ex-parte decree if within 30 days as per sub-section (3) of section 19 by depositing 10% of the decreetal amount an application has been filed for restoration of the suit after setting -aside the ex-parte decree, the suit will be automatically restored in terms of Section 19(4) of the Ain to its original file and number.
22.    Further, two aspects have been made clear in the said provisions of law that an application for restoration of the suit after setting-aside ex-parte decree may be made within 30 days right after passing of the ex-parte decree or from the date of knowledge of the ex-parte decree. The words used in sub-section 2 of section 19 of Ain “একতরফা ডিক্রির তারিখের অথবা উক্ত একতরফা ডিক্রি সম্পর্কে অবগত হইবার ৩০ দিবসের মধ্যে, উপ-ধারা (৩) এর বিধান সাপেক্ষে উক্ত এক তরফা ডিক্রী রদের জন্য দরখাস্ত করিতে পারিবেন”  clearly indicates two different situations for filing an application for restoration.
23.    Firstly, right after passing of the ex-parte decree and secondly, from the date of knowledge of the ex-parte decree as the case may be.
24.    Now, the question comes to our mind that whether by implication of sub-section 4 of Section 19 of the Ain, the suit will be automatically restored in both the situations.
25.    It is clear from the plain reading of the above provisions of law that right after passing of the ex-parte decree, Section 19(4) of the Ain comes into play i.e. the application if so filed within 30 days shall be automatically restored.
26.    However, it does not apply in a case where it has been contended by the defendant that having knowledge of the ex-parte decree the application for restoration has been filed.
27.    Now, it is our view that when the  question of knowledge is the basis for deciding an application for restoration that should be decided after taking evidence and hearing both  the parties.
28.    Furthermore, it has been decided in the case of Pubali Bank Ltd. vs Bangladesh reported in  66 DLR 317 that
"section 19(2) of the Ain does not  expressly prescribe for issuance of any notice upon the decree-holder to show cause in determining the correctness of the date of knowledge but it is the established principle of law that even when a statute is silent, notice has to be given if any person is sought to be affected in his right, interest, " property or character".
29.    Similar view has been expressed in the Indian Jurisdiction in the Case of Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India reported in AIR 1978 (SC) 597.
30.    It is our considered view that after pronouncement of ex-parte decree a legal right has been accrued in favour of the plaint of (decree-holder) and allowing of an application for setting aside the said decree, is curtailing  the accrued right of the decree-holder.
31.    In such a situation, our opinion is that the plaintiff has got a right to be informed about hearing of the said application by proper notice and the Adalat after hearing both the arties shall decide the issue as to correctness of the defendants alleged date of knowledge in order to satisfy itself towards the compliance of Section 19(2) of the Ain. In the instant case the Adalat did not comply with the said procedure of law.
32.    Now, in the present case the ex-parte judgment and decree was passed on 22-3-2009 and as per Section 19(2) of the Ain requires the defendant to file an application for setting aside the ex-parte decree either within 30 days from the date of passing of the said decree or within  30 days from the date of knowledge, about the said ex-parte decree.
33.    Admittedly, it is found from the materials available on record that the respondents were very much aware of the exparte decree dated 22-3-2009 in Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008 as far back as at least in the year 2009 contrary to their claim of date of knowledge that they knew nothing about the suit as well as the decree until 1-1-2012, which is abundantly clear that it is suppression of fact and amounts to fraud upon the court. In the present case, the defendant filed the Miscellaneous Case No.1 of 2012 on 11-1-2012 which is dearly beyond 30 days of passing the ex-parte decree dated 22-3-2009.
34.     It appears from the impugned order dated 16-1-2012 that the learned Judge of the Adalat, only consider one requirement of Section 19 of the Ain of deposing of 10% 'decreetal amount by the defendant' but did not at all consider anything regarding the question of limitation i.e. whether the case is filed within 30 days from the date of knowledge.
35.    Furthermore, as per section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which confers a duty upon the Court to see as to whether the suit/application is filed within time or not even if the issue of limitation has not been pressed, the court is legally bound to see and decide such issue in disposing of the matter before it.
36.    Now, the law is well settled that under a Special law where a time limit has been given to file an appeal, the provision of Section 5 of limitation Act will not apply and the Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003, being a special law, the provisions of Section 5 of the limitation Act will not apply and therefore the application for restoration shall be rejected outright.
37.    Further, 'he who comes into equity must come with clean hands'. It operates to prevent any affirmative recovery for the person with 'unclean hands' no matters how unfairly, the persons adversary has treated him or her. The maxim is the basis of the clean hands doctrine. Its purpose is to protect the integrity of the Court.
38.    In the present facts and circumstances of the case, we hold that the petitioners (respondents herein) of the Miscellaneous Case No. 1 of 2012 have come up with unclean hands.
39.    In the Pase of Zillur Rahman (Md) vs Md Abdul Quiyum Sarker reported in 18 BLC (AD) 25i it has been that
"Fraud vitiates everything. The plaintiff successes to prove that fraud was practised upon him by the defendant in executing and registering the impugned deed it vitiated the entire transaction."
40.    Further it has been held in the case of Janata Insurance Company Ltd vs Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT, Dhaka reported in 18 BLC 562 that "The suppression of fact is a heinous, detestable act, which cuts the very root of any claim, made in any discipline, far less to say before Constitutional Court. Therefore, caution goes without any controversy that suppression of fact vitiates everything."
41.    It is to be borne in mind that fraud or suppression of fact and fair play cannot dwell together, one must exclude the other. The Court stands for fair play only and to get equitable relief the respondent must approach the Court with clean hands.
42.    It is settled legal proposition, decided in the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs. Rajendra Singh AIR 2000 SC 1165, wherein the Hon'ble Court observed that "Fraud and Justice never dwell together" and it is a pristine maxim which has never lost its temper over all these centuries.
43.    It is our considered view that an act of fraud on Court is always viewed seriously. In judicial proceeding,', once fraud is proved, all advantages gained by playing fraud can be taken away. Suppression of any material fact/document amounts to a fraud upon the court.
44.    When facts are intentionally misrepresented or where a false statement is made intentionally, with the knowledge that it is false, with a view to deceive the other party, it is known as fraud. In the present case, it is clear that the respondents had knowledge of the ex-parte decree at least in the year of 2009, which is clearly suppression of facts and amounts to committing fraud upon the Court.
45. Further in the English Jurisdiction, in general, fraud has been defined as 'Fraud includes the suppression of the truth as well as the presentation of false information.' Any attempt to deceive is considered fraud, and when the attempt to deceive occurs in a judicial proceeding, it is "fraud upon the Court."
46. From the above discussions, it is crystal clear that the Adalat has committed wrong in passing the impugned order dated 16-1-2012 without deciding the question of limitation, which is a non speaking order and erroneous and should be interfered with as fraud has been committed upon the court. Thus we find merit in the appeal.
47.    In the result, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The impugned order No. 10 dated 16-1-2012 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Ain Adalat, 4th Court, Dhaka in Miscellaneous Case No. 1 of 2012 arising out of Artha Rin Suit No. 619 of 2008 is hereby set aside. Consequently, the connected Civil Rule No. 164 (FM) of 2012 is made absolute.
(Concluded)

Tariff
Add Rate

News Archive

Inside The New Nation

Editorial »

Jugglery of growth figures failed to create jobs


BANGLADESH'S economic growth though mesmerising, it has been proved over the past decade that jobs could not be created proportionately for the youths keeping adjustment with the growth. Besides, female participation in the labour force shrank in the last nine years, especially in rural areas. As a result employment elasticity, ...

Cricket »

Mashrafe seeks two months to ponder about his retirement


The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has shelved the idea of arranging a one-off ODI against Zimbabwe to give Mashrafe Bin Mortaza a grand farewell after the ODI captain asked the board to give him two months to think about his future.The decision to cancel the plan came after BCB president ...

Football »

Guardiola backs Sterling to reach 30-goal mark


AFP, Manchester :Pep Guardiola wants to see the on-form Raheem Sterling break the 30-goal barrier for the first time in his career this season, but will only judge the England forward on his overall contribution to the Manchester City team.Sterling has started the new campaign in prolific form, scoring in ...

City »

Bangabandu Sangskritik Jote paid tributes to Poet Shamsur Rahman by placing floral wreaths at his grave in the city's Banani on Saturday marking the 13th death anniversary of the poet.


International »

Hundreds defy restrictions, join protests in Kashmir


AP, New Delhi :Hundreds of people protested an unprecedented security crackdown and clashed with police Friday in Indian-controlled Kashmir, as India's government said it was constantly reviewing the situation in the disputed region and the restrictions there will be removed over the next few days.The U.N. Security Council met on ...

International »

Discussions on Afghan peace deal go ‘very well’, says Trump's spokesman


The White House says President Donald Trump's talks with his national security advisers to discuss Afghan peace talks went "very well" and that negotiations with the Taliban "are proceeding."Officials on August 16 said Trump was meeting with his top advisers to review negotiations with the extremist group about a possible ...

Entertainment »

Kona finally admits her secret marriage


Entertainment Desk :Popular singer Dilshad Nahar Kona revealed  on Thursday  that she had tied the knot with the person she loved, on April 21 of this year. Her husband, Golam Md Iftekhar, is a businessman, and has been in a relationship with Kona for seven years.Kona was heard saying to ...

Editorial »

Clashes among groups of govt followers on national mourning day


NEWSPAPERS reported that at least 22 people, including former Awami League lawmaker of Nilphamari-3 and upazila unit AL vice-president Golam Mustafa, were injured in a clash between two rival groups of the party in Jaldhaka of Nilphamari on Thursday. The clash took place when the groups hosted separate programmes to ...

City »

China-Bangla Friendship Association (CBFA) led by its President Dr Monouar Hasnat Khan and General Secretary Dr S.M Shahidul Islam placing wreaths at the Memorial Plaque of Father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman at 32 , Dhanmondi in the city on Thursday marking National Mourning Day .


.

Cricket »

England 258 all out in second Ashes Test


AFP, London :England were dismissed for 258 by Australia in the second Ashes Test at Lord's on Thursday.Only opener Rory Burns (53) and wicketkeeper Jonny Bairstow, last man out for 52, passed fifty after England were sent into bat by Australia captain Tim Paine following a total washout of Wednesday's ...

International »

Malaysia to question Zakir Naik for comments against Malaysian Hindus


Reuters, Kuala Lumpur :Malaysian authorities will summon controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik for questioning after he allegedly made racially sensitive remarks in the multi-ethnic nation, the government said on Thursday.The move comes after several ministers demanded Naik's expulsion on Wednesday after he said Hindus in Malaysia had "100 times more ...

Editorial »

Destroying biodiversity and its possible dangerous impact on human existence


BIODIVERSITY in Moulvibazar's Lathitila has been facing serious threat as settlers continue clearing forest areas for fruit cultivation and fish farming. According to newspaper reports, the vegetation at 5631.4 acres of land covered with hillocks is under continuous danger. Though only 30 landless families were allowed to settle inside the ...

Cricket »

BCB to discuss with Mashrafe about his retirement plan


The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) will talk to Mashrafe Bin Mortaza within couple of days to know his retirement plan as the board has a plan to give the ODI captain a grand farewell.On multiple occasions, Mashrafe said he has not many cricket ahead, but he actually did not reveal ...

International »

Saudi woman activist rejects release deal tied to denying torture


Reuters, Riyadh :Prominent Saudi women's rights activist Loujain al-Hathloul has rejected a proposal to secure her release from prison in exchange for a video statement denying reports she was tortured in custody, her family said on Tuesday.Hathloul, along with at least a dozen other women's rights activists, were arrested over ...

International »

Pelosi vows to thwart US-UK trade deal if Brexit risks Irish peace


The top Democrat in the US Congress warned Wednesday that lawmakers would block a trade pact with Britain if its exit from the EU undermines Northern Ireland's peace accord.President Donald Trump and senior advisors to Britain's new Prime Minister Boris Johnson have spoken of fast-tracking a trade deal once Brexit ...

 
Items that you save may be read at any time on your computer, iPad, iPhone or Android devices.
 
Are you new to our website? Do you have already an account at our website?
Create An Account Log in here
Email this news to a friend or like someone
Email:
Write a comment to this news