Home Today's Paper Most Popular Video Gallery Photo Gallery
Subscription Blog Signin Register
Logo
Saturday, October 19, 2019 04:22:58 AM
Follow Us On: Facebook Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter

Quasi Judicial Authority Cannot Set Aside Own Order

By
21st-Sep-2019       
Comments
Share your thought
Post a comment »
Read all () »

High Court Division :
(Special Statutory Jurisdiction)
Farah Mahbub J
SM Maniruzzaman J
 Commissioner,     Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate.....Appellant
vs
Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others. ........Respondents
Judgment
March 12th, 2019
Value Added Tax Act (XXII of 1991)
Section 42(1)(ga)
It is well settled that a quasi judicial authority cannot set aside his own order. The authority has set aside his self same earlier adjudication order which is without jurisdiction being functus officio. If the Customs authority is aggrieved by the adjudication order he or they may prefer appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. .. .... (16)
Sk Rashedul Haque, Advocate-For the Respondent No.2.
Samarendra Nath Biswas DAG with Khairunnesa AAG with Shamsuddoha Talukder AAG with Md Abul Kalam Khan Daud, AAG and AHM Ziauddin, AAG-For the Appellant-Government.
Judgment
SM Maniruzzaman J : This Appeal, under Section 42(1)(Ga) of the VAT Act, 1991 (instead of Section 196D of the Customs Act, 1969) is directed against the order dated 10-8-2006 passed by the respondent No.1 in CEVT/ Case(VAT)-177 of 2015 allowing the appeal and thereby setting aside the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 passed by the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Jessore vide order No. 28/LC/Siz/Comi/14.
2. Facts, relevant for disposal of the appeal, in short, are that while a Petrol Team of 6 BGB, Chuadanga was conducting duty received a secret information that a truck being No. Jessore : Ta 11-2737 carrying smuggled goods was leading towards Dhaka from Chuadanga. Ultimately, said Petrol Team was able to detain the vehicle at Garulpara, Khuksha, Kushtia along with the smuggled goods and prepared a seizure list. However, the seized goods along with the truck was handed over to the authority of Customs godown, Darshana, Jessore for confiscation under the Customs Act, 1969 (in short, the Act, 1969). Subsequently the. respondent No. 2 filed a representation to the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Jessore, appending relevant documents thereto in support of ownership of the truck with request to hand over the truck in his possession. However, the Commissioner issued a show cause notice on 27-1-2015 upon the said respondent to show cause as to why the truck being No. Jessore : Ta 11-2737 should not be confiscated in favour of the State under Clause 8 and 9 of the Table under Section 156(1) of the Act, 1969.
3. In response thereto, the respondent No. 2 submitted written reply stating, inter alia, that the truck in question was purchased by one Md Abdul Quddus from Nitol Motors Ltd. who later on sold the same in favour of the respondent No.2 on 9-10-2012. Since then he was carrying goods on rent by the truck. Accordingly, on 29-9-2014 while the driver was carrying the goods of Md Abul Hossain, Proprietor M/s Nazrul Enterprise with valid documents i.e. chalan, LC, invoice etc. on his truck which was loaded from Benapul and to be unloaded at Dhaka, the law enforcing agency had most illegally detained the said truck. Considering the facts, he requested to release the truck in his favour.
4. The appellant on receiving the aforesaid reply to the show cause notice and after hearing, confiscated the goods along with the truck in question in favour of the State under Clause 8 and 9 of the Table under Section 156(1) of the Act and Section 3(3) of the Import and Export (Control) Act, 1950 vide adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 with the following findings.
“এ মামলার নথিতে রক্ষিত সংশ্লিষ্ট সকল দলিলাদি পাঠ ও পর্যালোচনা করা হলো। আটক প্রতিবেদন, দাবীদারগণের দাবী আবেদন, কারণ দর্শানো নোটিশ, নোটিশের জবাব, ব্যক্তিগত শুনানিতে প্রদত্ত সকলের বক্তব্য, দাবী আবেদনের সাথে দাখিলকৃত দলিলাদি এবং তদন্ত কমিটির সম্পূরক তদন্ত প্রতিবেদনের সাথে দাখিলকৃত দলিলাদি এবং তদন্ত কমিটির সম্পূরক তদন্ত প্রবিদেন বিবেচনায় নেয়া হলো। দালিলাদি পাঠ ও পর্যালোচনান্তে এবং প্রাপ্ত তথ্য ও উপাত্তসমূহের আলোকে সংশ্লিষ্ট জি আর/শুল্ক মামলাভুক্ত (জি আর, নং-৪০৪/১৪ তাং-২৯-৯-২০১৪) ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার শাড়ী-৭৭২২ পিস, ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার থ্রিপিস-৪০৮ পিস এবং ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন শার্টের থানকাপড়-১১৭০০ মিটার এর দাবীদারের দাবী আবেদন প্রতিষ্ঠিত হয়নি এবং সন্দেহাতীতভাবে চোরাচালানকৃত মর্মে প্রমাণিত হয়েছে। আটককৃত সমূদয় পণ্য সন্দেহাতীতভাবে চোরাচালানকৃত প্রমাণিত সমুদয় পণ্য সন্দেহাতীতভাবে প্রমাণিত হওয়ায় --- “দি কাস্টমস এ্যাক্ট, ১৯৬৯’’ এর ১৫৬(১) ধারার টেবিলের কজ নং-৮ ও ৯, ধারা ১৫৭ এবং আমদানি ও রপ্তানি (নিয়ন্ত্রণ) আইন, ১৯৫০ এর ৩(৩) ধারার বিধান মোতাবেক উক্ত জিআরভুক্ত মালামাল ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার শাড়ী-৭৭২২ পিস, ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার থ্রিপিস-৪০৮ পিস, ভারতীয় শার্টের থানকাপড়-১১৭০০ মিটার এবং বহনকারী ট্রাক নং-যশোর-ট-১১-২৭৩৭ সরাসরি রাষ্ট্রের অনুকূলে বাজেয়াপ্ত করা হলো। একইসাথে ইতোপূর্বে জারীকৃত বিচারাদেশ নং-২৭/এলসি/সিজ/কমি/১৪, তাং-৭-৪-২০১৫ এতদ্বারা বাতিল করা হলো।”
5. Being aggrieved with the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 the respondent No.2 as appellant preferred appeal before the Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, under section 196(A) of the Act. Upon hearing the parties, the Tribunal allowed the appeal setting aside the adjudication order vide dated 10-8-2006 with the following findings:
“অত্র আপীল মামলাটি দো-তরফা শুনানি মূলে মজুর করা হলো। এতদ্বারা, বিজ্ঞ কমিশনার, কাস্টমস, এক্সাইজ ও ভ্যাট কমিশনারেট, ভোলা ট্যাংক রোড, যশোর এর আদেশ নং-২৮/এলসি/সিজ/কমি/১৪ তাং-৯-৪-১৫ আইনানুগ না হওয়ায় তা বাতিল করা হল এবং তর্কিত মামলায় আটককৃত ট্রাক নং-যশোর-ট-১১-২৭৩৭ আপীলকারীর নিকট নিঃশর্ত ফেরত প্রদানের আদেশ প্রদান করা হল। এবং আপীলকারী কর্তৃক পরিশোধিত। দাখিলকৃত ব্যাংক গ্যারান্টি/অঙ্গিকারনামা তাদের অনুকূলে ফেরৎ প্রদানের আদেশ দেওয়া হলো। আদেশের অনুলিপি সকলের প্রতি জারী করা হোক।”
6. Challenging the order of the Appellate Tribunal dated 10-8-2016 the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT, Commissonerate, Jessore as appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 42(1)(Ga) of the Value Added Tax Act, 1991 instead of Section 196 of the Customs Act, 1969 before this Division.
7. Mr Shamsuddoha Talukder, the learned Assistant Attorney-General appearing for the appellant submits that the Appellate Tribunal erred in law setting aside the adjudication order on surmise and conjecture without any basis on law and hence the impugned order of the Tribunal is liable to be set aside. He further submits that the truck in question was carrying smuggled goods which is a punishable offence under Section 157(2) of the. Act, 1969. Considering the facts, the adjudication authority has lawfully confiscated the truck in favour of the State, but the Appellate Tribunal without considering the facts of written statement and evidence on record of the appellant as well as law allowed the appeal setting aside the order of adjudication and, as such, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.     I
8. On the other hand, Mr Sk Rashedul Haque, the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2 after placing both the orders and relevant provisions of law submits that the present respondent preferred the instant appeal before the Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal under Section 196A of the Act, 1969 and after hearing the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal setting aside the adjudication order under Section 196B of the Act, 1969. But, the Commissioner; Customs, Excise and VAT as appellant filed the instant appeal under Section 42(1)(Ga) of the VAT Act, 1991 instead of Section 196D of the Act, 1969 and accordingly, the appeal was registered as VAT Appeal No. 69 of 2006. As such since the appeal has been filed in wrong forum, thus the appeal is liable to be dismissed as being filed in wrong forum. He also goes to submit that the Tribunal considering the documents in respect of ownership of the truck and other relevant evidence in support of carrying goods allowed the appeal setting aside the adjudication order and, as such, the instant appeal is liable to be dismissed. He further goes to argue that the appellant passed the adjudication order confiscating the truck on 19-4-2015 after setting aside his earlier self same adjudication order dated 7-4-2015 which is absolutely without jurisdiction and the Appellate Tribunal legally set aside the adjudication order directing the Customs authority to return the bank guarantee in favour of the respondent No.2.
9. Heard the learned Assistant Attorney-General appearing for the appellant and the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2; have gone through the memo of appeal, relevant materials on records and the provisions of law.
10. As it appears that the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT, Commissionerate, Jessore passed the adjudication order confiscating the truck in question under the Clause 8 and 9 of the Table under Section 156(1) and 157 of the Act, 1969 and Section 3(3) of the Import and Export (Control) Act, 1950.
11. Being aggrieved by the such order, the respondent No.2 as appellant preferred appeal before the Customs, Excise and VAT, Appellate Tribunal under Section 196A of the Customs Act, 1969. Upon hearing, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal and thereby setting aside the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 passed by the Commissioner Customs, Excise and VAT, Commissionerate by its order dated 21-8-2004 under Section 196B of the Act, 1969. Against such order the forum available to the appellant is under Section 196D of the Act, 1969. Section 196D of the Customs Act, 1969 provides that-
"The Commissioner of Customs or the other party may, within [ninety] days of the date upon which he is served with notice of an order under Section 196B, by an application, prefer an appeal to the High Court Division against such order."
12. But, the instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 42(1) (Ga) of the VAT Act, 1991 and accordingly it was registered as VAT appeal. In view of the above the instant appeal is liable to be dismissed for invoking wrong forum.
13. However, before passing the adjudication order, the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate (present appellant) had framed a inquiry committee by two Revenue Officers and after holding inquiry said officers submitted a report before the Commissioner stating inter alia that-
আটককৃত ট্রাক নং-ট-১১-২৭৩৭ এর দাবীদার কর্তৃক দাখিলকৃত বিক্রয় চুক্তিনামা, রুট পারমিট, ট্যাক্সটোকেন, ফিটনেস, সার্টিফিকেট, রেজিস্ট্রেশন সিøপ, ইন্সুরেন্স সনদ, ইত্যাদি দলিলাদি যাচাইয়ান্তে তদন্তকারী কর্মকর্তাদ্বয় দেখতে পান, গাড়ীটি জনাব আব্দুল কুদ্দুস, পিতা-ম"ত ফজলুল করিম মোড়ল, গ্রাম-নতুন মুলগ্রাম, ২৬ নং মুলগ্রাম, পোঃ নতুন মুলগ্রাম-৭৪৫০, থানা-কেশবপুর, যশোর কর্তৃক নিটল মটরস এর নিকট থেকে ক্রয়কৃত এবং পরবর্তীতে দাবীদার জনাব মোঃ আমজাদ হোসেন সরদার, পিতা-ম"ত মোফাজ্জেল হোসেন, গ্রাম-বাঁশবাড়িয়া, পোঃ-গোপসেনা-৭৪৫০ কেশবপুর, যশোর এর নিকট বিক্রয় করা হয়েছে। সুতরাং আটককৃত ট্রাক নং ১১-২৭৩৭ এর দাবীদার হিসাবে জনাব মোঃ আমজাদ হোসেন, পিতা-ম"ত মোফাজ্জেল হোসেন, গ্রাম-বাঁশবাড়িয়া, পোঃ-গোপসেনা-৭৪৫০ কেশবপুর, যশোর এর দাবী আবেদন প্রতিষ্ঠিত হয়েছে।
14. By filing affidavit dated 25-6-2018 the present respondent submitted original documents before this Court (as Additional evidence) and upon perusal of the documents it appears that the truck in question was originally belonged to Nitol Motors Ltd. by obtaining loan from United Commercial Bank Ltd. Mohakhali Branch, Dhaka. One Md Abdul Quddus purchased the truck being No. Jessore TA-1l-2737 from Nitol Motors Ltd. Subsequent to said purchase, he transferred the same to the respondent No. 2 and to that effect an agreement of sale was executed between them on 9-10-2012. As per agreement present respondent paid all installments to Nitol Motors Ltd. and accordingly, a certificate was issued certifying that Mr Amzad Hossain paid all installments to it. In support of ownership of the truck he also submitted tax token, fitness certificate, insurance certificate, chalan, payment receipts (Annexure- A series). We have noticed from Annexure-A series and it appears that the inquiry report so submitted by the two Revenue Officers relying on the materials on record. But, the adjudication authority without considering those documents and inquiry report confiscated the truck in favour of the State.
15. It appears from the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 that
চোরাচালানকৃত পণ্য পরিবহনের বিষয়টি সন্দেহাতীতভাবে প্রমাণিত হওয়ায় “দি কাস্টমস এ্যাক্ট, ১৯৬৯” এর ১৫৬(১) ধারার টেবিলের কজ নং-৮ ও ৯, ধারা ১৫৭ এবং আমদানী ও রপ্তানী (নিয়ন্ত্রণ) আইন, ১৯৫০ এর ৩(৩) ধারার বিধান মোতাবেক উক্ত জিআরভুক্ত মালামাল ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন  প্রকার শাড়ী-৭৭২২ পিস, ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার থ্রিপিস-৪০৮ পিস ভারতীয় শার্টের থানকাপড়-১১৭০০ মিটার এর বহনকারী ট্রাক নং-যশোর-ট-১১-২৭৩৭ সরাসরি রাষ্ট্রের অনুকূলে বাজেয়াপ্ত করা হলো।
একইসাথে ইতোপূর্বে জারীকৃত বিচারাদেশ নং-২৭/এলসি/সিজ/কমি/১৪, তাং-৭-৪-২০১৫ এতদ্বারা বাতিল করা হলো।
16. It is well settled that a quasi judicial authority cannot set aside his own order. But, in the present case, the appellant authority has set aside his self same earlier adjudication order dated 7-4-2015 vide adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 which is without jurisdiction being functus officio. If the Customs authority is aggrieved by the adjudication order dated 7-4-2015 he or they may prefer appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under Section 196A of the Act, 1969.
17. In view of the facts and circumstances stated hereinabove we are of the view that the respondent No.1, the Appellant Tribunal in considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law passed the impugned order dated 10-8-2016 setting aside the adjudication order passed by the appellant dated 9-4-2015.
18. We find no legal and factual infirmity in the impugned order.
19. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.
20. The impugned order dated 10.08.2006 passed by the respondent No.1 in CEVT /Case (VAT)-177 of 2015 allowing the appeal and thereby setting aside the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 passed by the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Jessore vide order No. 28/LC/Siz/Comi/14 is hereby uphold.
21. The Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Jessore, Bhola Tank Road, Jessore is hereby directed to return the truck being No. Jessore-TA-1l-2737 and Bank Guarantee furnished by the respondent No.2 within a period of 7 (seven) days from the date of receipt of the copy of judgment and order positively without fail.
22. Send down the lower Court's record at once.
23. The office is hereby directed to return the original documents filed by the respondent No. 2 before this Court after replacing the same with photocopies thereof.

Tariff
Add Rate

News Archive

Inside The New Nation

Editorial »

Monitoring must to prevent fatal gas cylinder blasts


THREE of a family died and three others were injured on their way home from hospital as the gas cylinder of an ambulance exploded in Chattogram's Anwara upazila on Thursday. The deceased were identified as Mafij Uddin, 65, his daughter-in-laws Babul Akter, 33, and Jainab Begum, 38, police said. Mafij's ...

Sports »

Chinese gymnast Chen Yile poses for photos after getting the ANOC award for Best Female Athlete of Asian Games 2018 during awarding ceremony of the ANOC Awards 2019 at the XXIV ANOC General Assembly Qatar 2019 in Doha, capital of Qatar on Thursday.


.

Entertainment »

Vidya honoured in London


Vidya Balan, who is currently stationed in London shooting for her highly-anticipated movie Shakuntala Devi - Human Computer, was recently invited by Imperial College to address the students who idolises the powerhouse performer for her exemplary body of work and for being one of the finest actors of Hindi film ...

Editorial »

Tackle urban poverty with well-designed safety nets


A WORLD Bank report stated that most of the urban poor are deprived of the government's social protection benefits. There is a large gap in allocation under social safety net, though the pace of poverty reduction has slowed and the ratio of extreme poverty edged up in urban areas after ...

Cricket »

Tamim Iqbal unlikely in T20 series in India


Bangladesh Opener Tamim Iqbal's return to International cricket is likely to be delayed as he suffered a muscle strain on the right side of the rib.The injury also forced him to sit out from the second round of the National Cricket League (NCL) in which his side Chattogram Division is ...

Entertainment »

Bindu Kona’s Krishna Leela


Sheikh Arif Bulbon :Among the present generation’s singers, Bindu Kona has been entertaining the hearts of many music-lovers by virtue of her melodious voice and stage performances. It is said that when Bindu Kona gets microphone on her hand on the stage, she becomes a different ‘Bindu Kona.’ While performing ...

International »

HK lawmakers dragged from chamber as leader heckled for second day


AFP, Hong Kong :Pro-democracy lawmakers were dragged out of Hong Kong's legislature by security guards on Thursday after they heckled the city's pro-Beijing leader for a second day running, the latest outburst of political rancour in the strife-torn city.Chief Executive Carrie Lam has faced an outpouring of anger from her ...

International »

Diplomatic stalemate fuels dangerous Saudi-Iran standoff


AFP, Abu Dhabi :The dangerous rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran, played out in proxy wars and mystery strikes, is destined to fester as long as neither reaches across the gulf that divides them, observers say.At the Beirut Institute Summit in the United Arab Emirates this week, heated sessions dominated ...

City »

Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal brought out a silent procession on Dhaka University campus on Thursday demanding trial of killers of Abrar Fahad and release of BNP Chief Begum Khaleda Zia.


Editorial »

Stringent measures needed to bring onion prices at tolerable level


THOUGH the prices of onion decreased slightly in the last week following adequate supply in markets, consistent open market sale (OMS) and monitoring by the government, it's again showing upward trend due to syndicated activities of some unscrupulous traders. The business syndicates defying government's monitoring allegedly playing tricks to make ...

Football »

FIFA president 'disappointed' by empty stands at Koreas qualifier


AFP, Seoul :FIFA president Gianni Infantino said he was "disappointed" after attending a historic but bizarre World Cup qualifier between North and South Korea that had empty stands and no live broadcast.The rare match in the North Korean capital ended 0-0 on Tuesday, with Infantino one of the few people ...

International »

Debating Democrats blast Trump, demand his impeachment


AFP, Westerville :Democratic White House hopeful united in searing condemnation of Donald Trump during their fourth debate Tuesday, saying the president has broken the law, abused his power, and deserves to be impeached.From the opening moments, most of the dozen candidates on stage launched fierce broadsides against Trump over the ...

Entertainment »

Crown of ‘Miss Universe Bangladesh 2019’ unveiled


Entertainment Report :A franchise of Miss Universe, ‘Miss Universe Bangladesh 2019 was unveiled its prestigious crown (Tiara) on Tuesday with the presence of top 10 contests of the beauty pageant. The event was held at the Amisheé Fine Jewelry flagship store in the capital’s Gulshan area. Two judges of this ...

International »

Qatar rules out possibility of war between US and Iran


AFP, Doha :Qatar's defence minister ruled out Wednesday the possibility of a war between the United States and Iran amid rising tensions in the Gulf following attacks on oil tankers.Doha is an ally of Washington, but also has good relations with Tehran that has helped it overcome a political and ...

Editorial »

Anti-Corruption Commission must prove its success by conviction


The Anti-Corruption Commission has initiated an investigation against 43 people involved in illegal casino businesses. A senior ACC official told the reporters that they had obtained evidence against these 43 people to be involved as bigwigs in illegal casino operations, who included ruling party stalwarts and former and serving government ...

 
Items that you save may be read at any time on your computer, iPad, iPhone or Android devices.
 
Are you new to our website? Do you have already an account at our website?
Create An Account Log in here
Email this news to a friend or like someone
Email:
Write a comment to this news