Home Today's Paper Most Popular Video Gallery Photo Gallery
Subscription Blog Signin Register
Logo
Tuesday, September 29, 2020 04:32:19 PM
Follow Us On: Facebook Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter

Quasi Judicial Authority Cannot Set Aside Own Order

By
21st-Sep-2019       
Share
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Save
  • E-mail
  • Print
Comments
Share your thought
Post a comment »
Read all () »

High Court Division :
(Special Statutory Jurisdiction)
Farah Mahbub J
SM Maniruzzaman J
 Commissioner,     Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate.....Appellant
vs
Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others. ........Respondents
Judgment
March 12th, 2019
Value Added Tax Act (XXII of 1991)
Section 42(1)(ga)
It is well settled that a quasi judicial authority cannot set aside his own order. The authority has set aside his self same earlier adjudication order which is without jurisdiction being functus officio. If the Customs authority is aggrieved by the adjudication order he or they may prefer appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. .. .... (16)
Sk Rashedul Haque, Advocate-For the Respondent No.2.
Samarendra Nath Biswas DAG with Khairunnesa AAG with Shamsuddoha Talukder AAG with Md Abul Kalam Khan Daud, AAG and AHM Ziauddin, AAG-For the Appellant-Government.
Judgment
SM Maniruzzaman J : This Appeal, under Section 42(1)(Ga) of the VAT Act, 1991 (instead of Section 196D of the Customs Act, 1969) is directed against the order dated 10-8-2006 passed by the respondent No.1 in CEVT/ Case(VAT)-177 of 2015 allowing the appeal and thereby setting aside the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 passed by the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Jessore vide order No. 28/LC/Siz/Comi/14.
2. Facts, relevant for disposal of the appeal, in short, are that while a Petrol Team of 6 BGB, Chuadanga was conducting duty received a secret information that a truck being No. Jessore : Ta 11-2737 carrying smuggled goods was leading towards Dhaka from Chuadanga. Ultimately, said Petrol Team was able to detain the vehicle at Garulpara, Khuksha, Kushtia along with the smuggled goods and prepared a seizure list. However, the seized goods along with the truck was handed over to the authority of Customs godown, Darshana, Jessore for confiscation under the Customs Act, 1969 (in short, the Act, 1969). Subsequently the. respondent No. 2 filed a representation to the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Jessore, appending relevant documents thereto in support of ownership of the truck with request to hand over the truck in his possession. However, the Commissioner issued a show cause notice on 27-1-2015 upon the said respondent to show cause as to why the truck being No. Jessore : Ta 11-2737 should not be confiscated in favour of the State under Clause 8 and 9 of the Table under Section 156(1) of the Act, 1969.
3. In response thereto, the respondent No. 2 submitted written reply stating, inter alia, that the truck in question was purchased by one Md Abdul Quddus from Nitol Motors Ltd. who later on sold the same in favour of the respondent No.2 on 9-10-2012. Since then he was carrying goods on rent by the truck. Accordingly, on 29-9-2014 while the driver was carrying the goods of Md Abul Hossain, Proprietor M/s Nazrul Enterprise with valid documents i.e. chalan, LC, invoice etc. on his truck which was loaded from Benapul and to be unloaded at Dhaka, the law enforcing agency had most illegally detained the said truck. Considering the facts, he requested to release the truck in his favour.
4. The appellant on receiving the aforesaid reply to the show cause notice and after hearing, confiscated the goods along with the truck in question in favour of the State under Clause 8 and 9 of the Table under Section 156(1) of the Act and Section 3(3) of the Import and Export (Control) Act, 1950 vide adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 with the following findings.
“এ মামলার নথিতে রক্ষিত সংশ্লিষ্ট সকল দলিলাদি পাঠ ও পর্যালোচনা করা হলো। আটক প্রতিবেদন, দাবীদারগণের দাবী আবেদন, কারণ দর্শানো নোটিশ, নোটিশের জবাব, ব্যক্তিগত শুনানিতে প্রদত্ত সকলের বক্তব্য, দাবী আবেদনের সাথে দাখিলকৃত দলিলাদি এবং তদন্ত কমিটির সম্পূরক তদন্ত প্রতিবেদনের সাথে দাখিলকৃত দলিলাদি এবং তদন্ত কমিটির সম্পূরক তদন্ত প্রবিদেন বিবেচনায় নেয়া হলো। দালিলাদি পাঠ ও পর্যালোচনান্তে এবং প্রাপ্ত তথ্য ও উপাত্তসমূহের আলোকে সংশ্লিষ্ট জি আর/শুল্ক মামলাভুক্ত (জি আর, নং-৪০৪/১৪ তাং-২৯-৯-২০১৪) ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার শাড়ী-৭৭২২ পিস, ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার থ্রিপিস-৪০৮ পিস এবং ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন শার্টের থানকাপড়-১১৭০০ মিটার এর দাবীদারের দাবী আবেদন প্রতিষ্ঠিত হয়নি এবং সন্দেহাতীতভাবে চোরাচালানকৃত মর্মে প্রমাণিত হয়েছে। আটককৃত সমূদয় পণ্য সন্দেহাতীতভাবে চোরাচালানকৃত প্রমাণিত সমুদয় পণ্য সন্দেহাতীতভাবে প্রমাণিত হওয়ায় --- “দি কাস্টমস এ্যাক্ট, ১৯৬৯’’ এর ১৫৬(১) ধারার টেবিলের কজ নং-৮ ও ৯, ধারা ১৫৭ এবং আমদানি ও রপ্তানি (নিয়ন্ত্রণ) আইন, ১৯৫০ এর ৩(৩) ধারার বিধান মোতাবেক উক্ত জিআরভুক্ত মালামাল ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার শাড়ী-৭৭২২ পিস, ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার থ্রিপিস-৪০৮ পিস, ভারতীয় শার্টের থানকাপড়-১১৭০০ মিটার এবং বহনকারী ট্রাক নং-যশোর-ট-১১-২৭৩৭ সরাসরি রাষ্ট্রের অনুকূলে বাজেয়াপ্ত করা হলো। একইসাথে ইতোপূর্বে জারীকৃত বিচারাদেশ নং-২৭/এলসি/সিজ/কমি/১৪, তাং-৭-৪-২০১৫ এতদ্বারা বাতিল করা হলো।”
5. Being aggrieved with the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 the respondent No.2 as appellant preferred appeal before the Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, under section 196(A) of the Act. Upon hearing the parties, the Tribunal allowed the appeal setting aside the adjudication order vide dated 10-8-2006 with the following findings:
“অত্র আপীল মামলাটি দো-তরফা শুনানি মূলে মজুর করা হলো। এতদ্বারা, বিজ্ঞ কমিশনার, কাস্টমস, এক্সাইজ ও ভ্যাট কমিশনারেট, ভোলা ট্যাংক রোড, যশোর এর আদেশ নং-২৮/এলসি/সিজ/কমি/১৪ তাং-৯-৪-১৫ আইনানুগ না হওয়ায় তা বাতিল করা হল এবং তর্কিত মামলায় আটককৃত ট্রাক নং-যশোর-ট-১১-২৭৩৭ আপীলকারীর নিকট নিঃশর্ত ফেরত প্রদানের আদেশ প্রদান করা হল। এবং আপীলকারী কর্তৃক পরিশোধিত। দাখিলকৃত ব্যাংক গ্যারান্টি/অঙ্গিকারনামা তাদের অনুকূলে ফেরৎ প্রদানের আদেশ দেওয়া হলো। আদেশের অনুলিপি সকলের প্রতি জারী করা হোক।”
6. Challenging the order of the Appellate Tribunal dated 10-8-2016 the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT, Commissonerate, Jessore as appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 42(1)(Ga) of the Value Added Tax Act, 1991 instead of Section 196 of the Customs Act, 1969 before this Division.
7. Mr Shamsuddoha Talukder, the learned Assistant Attorney-General appearing for the appellant submits that the Appellate Tribunal erred in law setting aside the adjudication order on surmise and conjecture without any basis on law and hence the impugned order of the Tribunal is liable to be set aside. He further submits that the truck in question was carrying smuggled goods which is a punishable offence under Section 157(2) of the. Act, 1969. Considering the facts, the adjudication authority has lawfully confiscated the truck in favour of the State, but the Appellate Tribunal without considering the facts of written statement and evidence on record of the appellant as well as law allowed the appeal setting aside the order of adjudication and, as such, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.     I
8. On the other hand, Mr Sk Rashedul Haque, the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2 after placing both the orders and relevant provisions of law submits that the present respondent preferred the instant appeal before the Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal under Section 196A of the Act, 1969 and after hearing the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal setting aside the adjudication order under Section 196B of the Act, 1969. But, the Commissioner; Customs, Excise and VAT as appellant filed the instant appeal under Section 42(1)(Ga) of the VAT Act, 1991 instead of Section 196D of the Act, 1969 and accordingly, the appeal was registered as VAT Appeal No. 69 of 2006. As such since the appeal has been filed in wrong forum, thus the appeal is liable to be dismissed as being filed in wrong forum. He also goes to submit that the Tribunal considering the documents in respect of ownership of the truck and other relevant evidence in support of carrying goods allowed the appeal setting aside the adjudication order and, as such, the instant appeal is liable to be dismissed. He further goes to argue that the appellant passed the adjudication order confiscating the truck on 19-4-2015 after setting aside his earlier self same adjudication order dated 7-4-2015 which is absolutely without jurisdiction and the Appellate Tribunal legally set aside the adjudication order directing the Customs authority to return the bank guarantee in favour of the respondent No.2.
9. Heard the learned Assistant Attorney-General appearing for the appellant and the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent No.2; have gone through the memo of appeal, relevant materials on records and the provisions of law.
10. As it appears that the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT, Commissionerate, Jessore passed the adjudication order confiscating the truck in question under the Clause 8 and 9 of the Table under Section 156(1) and 157 of the Act, 1969 and Section 3(3) of the Import and Export (Control) Act, 1950.
11. Being aggrieved by the such order, the respondent No.2 as appellant preferred appeal before the Customs, Excise and VAT, Appellate Tribunal under Section 196A of the Customs Act, 1969. Upon hearing, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal and thereby setting aside the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 passed by the Commissioner Customs, Excise and VAT, Commissionerate by its order dated 21-8-2004 under Section 196B of the Act, 1969. Against such order the forum available to the appellant is under Section 196D of the Act, 1969. Section 196D of the Customs Act, 1969 provides that-
"The Commissioner of Customs or the other party may, within [ninety] days of the date upon which he is served with notice of an order under Section 196B, by an application, prefer an appeal to the High Court Division against such order."
12. But, the instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 42(1) (Ga) of the VAT Act, 1991 and accordingly it was registered as VAT appeal. In view of the above the instant appeal is liable to be dismissed for invoking wrong forum.
13. However, before passing the adjudication order, the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate (present appellant) had framed a inquiry committee by two Revenue Officers and after holding inquiry said officers submitted a report before the Commissioner stating inter alia that-
আটককৃত ট্রাক নং-ট-১১-২৭৩৭ এর দাবীদার কর্তৃক দাখিলকৃত বিক্রয় চুক্তিনামা, রুট পারমিট, ট্যাক্সটোকেন, ফিটনেস, সার্টিফিকেট, রেজিস্ট্রেশন সিøপ, ইন্সুরেন্স সনদ, ইত্যাদি দলিলাদি যাচাইয়ান্তে তদন্তকারী কর্মকর্তাদ্বয় দেখতে পান, গাড়ীটি জনাব আব্দুল কুদ্দুস, পিতা-ম"ত ফজলুল করিম মোড়ল, গ্রাম-নতুন মুলগ্রাম, ২৬ নং মুলগ্রাম, পোঃ নতুন মুলগ্রাম-৭৪৫০, থানা-কেশবপুর, যশোর কর্তৃক নিটল মটরস এর নিকট থেকে ক্রয়কৃত এবং পরবর্তীতে দাবীদার জনাব মোঃ আমজাদ হোসেন সরদার, পিতা-ম"ত মোফাজ্জেল হোসেন, গ্রাম-বাঁশবাড়িয়া, পোঃ-গোপসেনা-৭৪৫০ কেশবপুর, যশোর এর নিকট বিক্রয় করা হয়েছে। সুতরাং আটককৃত ট্রাক নং ১১-২৭৩৭ এর দাবীদার হিসাবে জনাব মোঃ আমজাদ হোসেন, পিতা-ম"ত মোফাজ্জেল হোসেন, গ্রাম-বাঁশবাড়িয়া, পোঃ-গোপসেনা-৭৪৫০ কেশবপুর, যশোর এর দাবী আবেদন প্রতিষ্ঠিত হয়েছে।
14. By filing affidavit dated 25-6-2018 the present respondent submitted original documents before this Court (as Additional evidence) and upon perusal of the documents it appears that the truck in question was originally belonged to Nitol Motors Ltd. by obtaining loan from United Commercial Bank Ltd. Mohakhali Branch, Dhaka. One Md Abdul Quddus purchased the truck being No. Jessore TA-1l-2737 from Nitol Motors Ltd. Subsequent to said purchase, he transferred the same to the respondent No. 2 and to that effect an agreement of sale was executed between them on 9-10-2012. As per agreement present respondent paid all installments to Nitol Motors Ltd. and accordingly, a certificate was issued certifying that Mr Amzad Hossain paid all installments to it. In support of ownership of the truck he also submitted tax token, fitness certificate, insurance certificate, chalan, payment receipts (Annexure- A series). We have noticed from Annexure-A series and it appears that the inquiry report so submitted by the two Revenue Officers relying on the materials on record. But, the adjudication authority without considering those documents and inquiry report confiscated the truck in favour of the State.
15. It appears from the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 that
চোরাচালানকৃত পণ্য পরিবহনের বিষয়টি সন্দেহাতীতভাবে প্রমাণিত হওয়ায় “দি কাস্টমস এ্যাক্ট, ১৯৬৯” এর ১৫৬(১) ধারার টেবিলের কজ নং-৮ ও ৯, ধারা ১৫৭ এবং আমদানী ও রপ্তানী (নিয়ন্ত্রণ) আইন, ১৯৫০ এর ৩(৩) ধারার বিধান মোতাবেক উক্ত জিআরভুক্ত মালামাল ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন  প্রকার শাড়ী-৭৭২২ পিস, ভারতীয় বিভিন্ন প্রকার থ্রিপিস-৪০৮ পিস ভারতীয় শার্টের থানকাপড়-১১৭০০ মিটার এর বহনকারী ট্রাক নং-যশোর-ট-১১-২৭৩৭ সরাসরি রাষ্ট্রের অনুকূলে বাজেয়াপ্ত করা হলো।
একইসাথে ইতোপূর্বে জারীকৃত বিচারাদেশ নং-২৭/এলসি/সিজ/কমি/১৪, তাং-৭-৪-২০১৫ এতদ্বারা বাতিল করা হলো।
16. It is well settled that a quasi judicial authority cannot set aside his own order. But, in the present case, the appellant authority has set aside his self same earlier adjudication order dated 7-4-2015 vide adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 which is without jurisdiction being functus officio. If the Customs authority is aggrieved by the adjudication order dated 7-4-2015 he or they may prefer appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under Section 196A of the Act, 1969.
17. In view of the facts and circumstances stated hereinabove we are of the view that the respondent No.1, the Appellant Tribunal in considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law passed the impugned order dated 10-8-2016 setting aside the adjudication order passed by the appellant dated 9-4-2015.
18. We find no legal and factual infirmity in the impugned order.
19. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.
20. The impugned order dated 10.08.2006 passed by the respondent No.1 in CEVT /Case (VAT)-177 of 2015 allowing the appeal and thereby setting aside the adjudication order dated 9-4-2015 passed by the Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Jessore vide order No. 28/LC/Siz/Comi/14 is hereby uphold.
21. The Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionerate, Jessore, Bhola Tank Road, Jessore is hereby directed to return the truck being No. Jessore-TA-1l-2737 and Bank Guarantee furnished by the respondent No.2 within a period of 7 (seven) days from the date of receipt of the copy of judgment and order positively without fail.
22. Send down the lower Court's record at once.
23. The office is hereby directed to return the original documents filed by the respondent No. 2 before this Court after replacing the same with photocopies thereof.

Tariff
Add Rate

News Archive

Inside The New Nation

Editorial »

WASA must ensure supply of clean water for Dhaka dwellers


THE level of mismanagement, inefficiency and corruption in WASA's handling of water supply and sewerage in the capital has been greatly exposed. Despite implementation of many projects costing hundreds of crores of taka over the years, Dhaka city dwellers in many areas are still living with dirty and foul-smelling water, ...

International »

Pompeo visits Greece in bid to ease East Med tensions


Al Jazeera News :US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has begun a two-day visit to Greece for talks aimed at de-escalating tensions in the eastern Mediterranean and setting the groundwork for dialogue between Athens and Ankara.The often-testy relations between Greece and neighbouring Turkey have deteriorated sharply this year, particularly over ...

Entertainment »

Indo-American Shree Saini in race for Miss World America pageant


Miss World America recently announced its 2020 contestants list. The 2020 Miss World America pageant will see Indian American Shree Saini. She is the chosen representative of Washington State. She is a survivor of heart surgery at age 12 for a pacemaker implant and she is a burns survivor. She ...

Editorial »

Observing Rivers Day while saving the water bodies from pollution


THE World Rivers Day on September 27, observed globally this year on the theme of 'waterways in our communities', left a question --- what is the condition of our rivers? Historically rivers play a vital role in human settlement in this delta with livelihood, communication, agricultural production. Rivers here viewed ...

City »

BIWTA Chairman Commodore Golam Sadeq speaks as Chief Guest at a photo exhibition on 100 rivers at Sadarghat Terminal on Sunday.


Editorial »

Registrar to get charge of VC in SAU not rational


DHAKA University Teachers' Association protested the decision of giving Sher-e-Bangla Agriculture University (SAU) registrar the charge of Vice-Chancellor of the university. Amid the deteriorating education quality for student politics, absence of academic integrity, teachers' involvement in administrative functions more than academic and their partisan politics, the decision of giving charge ...

International »

South Korea's domestic coronavirus cases fall to lowest in 44 days


Reuters, Seoul :South Korea on Saturday reported 49 new domestic coronavirus cases, the smallest number of locally transmitted cases in 44 days in a sign that tighter social distancing rules are paying off.Health officials reiterated calls on people to refrain from visiting their hometowns and meeting with relatives during the ...

International »

Lebanon PM-designate steps down


Al Jazeera News :Lebanon's prime minister-designate Mustapha Adib has announced his resignation after his efforts to line up a non-partisan cabinet ran into trouble, particularly over who would run the finance ministry.In a televised address on Saturday, Adib said he was stepping down from "the task of forming the government" ...

City »

Former State Minister for Information Prof Abu Sayeed speaks at the extended meeting of Gonoforum at the Jatiya Press Club on Saturday demanding national unity for meaningful change.


City »

Chairman of Jatiya Ganotantrik Andolon Khokon Chowdhury speaks at the biennial conference of Trinamul NDM at the Jatiya Press Club on Saturday.


Entertainment »

Kazi Shoma coming with original song


Entertainment Report :Singer Kazi Shoma has been engaged with music for many days. She got praise for rendering songs in and outside the country. She has an inner want to render an original song. But she could not do it for various reasons. Before Corona pandemic she wanted to fulfil ...

Editorial »

EC can`t avert responsibility of criminal nexus that makes fake NIDs


THE Election Commission is struggling to check forgeries of National Identity Cards while it suspects that a group of voter registration officers and data entry operators are involved in the scam. Several probe teams formed on various occasions have found that people are forging NIDs to gain illegal benefits, including ...

Football »

Messi says Suarez deserved more from Barcelona in move to Atletico Madrid


BBC Online :Lionel Messi says Luis Suarez deserved a better send-off from Barcelona but that he is "no longer surprised" by the club's treatment of the striker.Suarez has joined Atletico Madrid after being told he was not in new Barca boss Ronald Koeman's plans.Earlier this month, Messi said he would ...

Entertainment »

Pori Moni to play Pritilata’s role in movie


Sheikh Arif Bulbon :Popular film actress Pori Moni has signed in to play the role of Pritilata Waddedar, who was the first Bengali revolutionary martyred woman in the Subcontinent. Affiliation of Pori Moni with the movie was announced on the death anniversary of Pritilata Waddedar on September 24.Golam Rabbani wrote ...

Editorial »

Corruption is no problem but giving too many extensions is bad


AKM Fazlullah, the 79-year-old Managing Director of Chattogram Water Supply and Sewerage Authority, is likely to get extension for another three-year term after serving the position for nine years.In 2009, Fazlullah was first appointed as the chairman of the CWASA, 11 years after he had gone into retirement as an ...

 
Items that you save may be read at any time on your computer, iPad, iPhone or Android devices.
 
Are you new to our website? Do you have already an account at our website?
Create An Account Log in here
Email this news to a friend or like someone
Email:
Write a comment to this news