Home Today's Paper Most Popular Video Gallery Photo Gallery
Subscription Blog Signin Register
Logo
Sunday, February 23, 2020 12:37:04 AM
Follow Us On: Facebook Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter

Failure of the principal borrower

No embargo upon selling 3rd party mortgage

By
05th-Oct-2019       
Share
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Save
  • E-mail
  • Print
Comments
Share your thought
Post a comment »
Read all () »

High Court Division :
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
JBM Hassan J
Md Khairul Alam J

Rupali Bank Limited.........Petitioner
vs
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka and others..............Respondents
Judgment
December 13th, 2018
Artha Rin Adalat Ain (VIII of 2003)
Section 33(5)
Since, no properly was mortgaged by the principal borrower, direction is not in any way put any embargo upon the Adalat to sell the properties mortgaged by the 3rd party mortgagors including the properties of the respondents Nos. 2-10 in auction and to issue certificate under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 in favour of the petitioner. .. .... (13)
Bakul Aktar vs Bangladesh, 16 BLC (AD) 4; Mohiuddin (SK) vs Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka 13 MLR (AD) 356 and Abdus Sattar Miah vs Bangladesh, 14 BLC 412 ref.
Md Imam Hasan, Advocate-For the Petitioner.
None appears-For the Respondents.
Judgment
Md Khairul Alam J : At the instance of the petitioner, Rupali Bank Limited, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 13-11-2014 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Artha Rin Execution Case No. 28 of 2012 allowing an application filed by the judgment-debtor respondents No. 2-10 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (shortly, the Code) for removing the 'B' scheduled mortgaged properties from the certificate issued in favour of the petitioner under Section 33(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Annexure-F) should not be declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect.
2. Relevant facts for disposal of the Rule, in short, are that the respondent No. 11, a limited company, took loan from the petitioner, Rupali Bank Limited, Motijheel Branch, Motijheel, Dhaka (shortly, the Bank). Since the borrower failed to repay the loan, the Bank as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Suit No. 65 of 2006 before the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka (shortly, the Adalat) impleading the present respondents Nos. 2-26 as defendants for realization of the loan amounting to Taka 28144478.24. Ultimately, the suit was decreed on 25-4-2007 and the Bank put the decree in execution by filing Execution Case No. 167 of 2007. During pendency of the execution case respondents Nos. 2-10 as petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4792 of 2008 before this Court praying for a direction not to sell B scheduled mortgaged properties in auction before selling the mortgaged properties of the principal borrower. This Court without issuing any Rule by the order dated 23-7-2008 gave a direction to the Adalat not to sell the mortgaged properties of those petitioners (respondents Nos. 2-10 herein) before selling the mortgaged properties of the principal borrower, if any at all. Artha Execution Case No. 167 of 2007 was dismissed for default on 3-7-2011 and subsequently the Bank filed second execution case being Execution Case No. 28 of 2012. In second execution case it was tried to sell the mortgaged properties in auction as per provision of Section 33 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (shortly, the Ain, 2003) but it could not be sold in auction due to non-participation of the bidder. Thereafter, the Bank filed an application under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 praying for issuance of certificate in respect of all mortgaged properties including the properties of B scheduled mortgaged by the predecessor of the respondents Nos. 2-10 (petitioner of the writ petition No. 4792 of 2008) in its favour. Ultimately, the said application was allowed by the order dated 11-11-2014 and thereby certificate as per Section 33 (5) of the Ain, 2003 was issued in favour of the Bank and the Artha Execution Case No. 28 of 2012 was disposed of finally. After issuance of the certificate under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 in favour of the Bank and disposing of the Artha Execution Case No. 28 of 2012 finally on 11-11-2014, the respondents No. 2-10 filed an application under Section 151 of the Code praying for removing the B scheduled properties from the certificate issued under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 in favour of the Bank. The Bank filed written objection against the said application but the Adalat allowed said application on 5-1-2015 and thereby removed the B scheduled properties from the certificate issued earlier. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said order the petitioner moved before this Court and obtained the present Rule and an ad interim order of stay.
3. None appears to oppose the Rule.
4. Mr Imam Hasan, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent No. 1, the Adalat passed the impugned order by misinterpreting the judgment and order dated 23-7-08 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4792 of 2008 inasmuch as in the said judgment no direction was given upon the respondent No. 1 to remove the B scheduled properties from attachment or certificate issued under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003. He further submits that the respondent No. 1 passed the impugned order without taking into consideration that after taking steps under Sections 33(1) and 33(4) of the Ain, 2003 the Adalat has no alternative but to issue certificate under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003. He also submits that the respondent No.1 failed to take into consideration that Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 has authorized the Adalat to issue certificate vesting the right of possession and enjoyment of mortgaged property upon the decree holder with the authority to transfer 1 sell the mortgaged property by the decree holder as per provisions of Sections 33(1) to 33(4) of the Ain, 2003 to satisfy the loan complying with provision of Section 6(5) of the Ain. Therefore, removal of B scheduled properties from the certificate issued under Section 33(5) of the Ain is beyond the directives given in the judgment and order dated 23-7-2008 passed in Writ petition No. 4792 of 2008 and also beyond the provisions of Sections 6(5) and 33(5) of the Ain, 2003. Mr Hasan also submits that the respondent No.1 passed the impugned judgment and order without taking into consideration that after issuance of certificate under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 in favour of the Bank, Artha Rin Execution Case has finally been disposed of and there is no provision to reopen the Execution Case under the Ain, 2003. He also submits that the' respondent No.1 passed the impugned order without taking into consideration that the Ain, 2003 is a special law, there is no scope to entertain an application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. He further submits that the application which was allowed by the Adalat is neither signed and executed by the applicant nor said application is supported by any affidavit or verification and, as such, impugned order entertaining said application is illegal. He also submits that defendant No.1, Fashion Trust (Pvt) Limited, a limited company is the principal borrower but the said company did not have any mortgaged property and that C and D scheduled properties were the personal properties of the Managing Director and Directors of the company and they mortgaged the same in personal capacity. Therefore, all the mortgaged properties stand on same footing. In support of submission he relies upon the decision of Bakul Aktar vs Bangladesh 16 BLC (AD) 4. He lastly submits that the respondent No. 1 took attempts for auction on 10-7-2012 and 28-3-2013 to sell the mortgaged properties but due to non participation of the bidder the properties could not be sold in auction and, as such, respondent No. 1 rightly issued the certificate and thereby the impugned order removing the B scheduled properties from the certificate is illegal.
5. We have gone through the writ petition and perused the documents annexed thereto.
6. In the case of Mohiuddin (SK) vs Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka reported in 13 MLR (AD) 356 the Apex Court observed as follows:
"Mr AJ Mohammad Ali the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the certificate issued under Section 33(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 in favour of the decree-holder bank is only for possession and enjoyment of the mortgaged property and it did not mean final disposal of the execution case for which turther action for disposal of the suit property is necessary under Section 33(7) of the said Act, but High Court Division misconstrued the provision of Section 33(9) in holding that the execution case was finally disposed of and thereby erred in summarily rejecting the writ petition. He lastly submits that the decree being preliminary form, the suit remained pending and thus the Artha Rin Adalat had the jurisdiction to consider the application for stay under Section 44 of the Act and to grant installment payment under Section 49 of the Act, but the Artha Rin Adalat failed to exercise its jurisdiction on the erroneous view of law that it became functus officio and had no jurisdiction to decide the application on merit.
We have heard the learned Advocate and perused the connected papers including the impugned judgment. We do  not find any substance in the points raised.
The High Court Division upon correct assessment of the legal position and materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same." (underlined)
7. As the mortgaged properties could not be sold in auction due to non-participation of the bidder in the bid, the Adalat, on the prayer of decree holder Bank, issued a certificate under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 and the execution case was disposed of accordingly on 11-11-2014 and the executing Adalat became functus officio on that very day as settled by our Apex Court by the above ratio. Therefore, the Adalat misconstrued the provision of law in allowing the application filed under Section 151 of the Code by the impugned order dated 13-11-2014 removing the B scheduled mortgaged properties from the certificate issued in favour of the petitioner under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 after final disposal of the execution case on 11-11-2014.
8. In the case of Bakul Aktar vs Bangladesh, 16 BLC (AD) 4 the Apex Court observed as follows:
"A company incorporated under the Companies Act is a juristic person. A share-holder is not the owner of the company or its assets. The company itself owns its properties. A share-holder is only entitled to the dividends, if declared. On winding up however, after payment of its debts, he is entitled to participate in the distribution of its assets. The liability of a share-holder, whether he is the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or a Director, is only to the extent of the face value of the shares he hold, nothing more than that. But if he guarantees repayment of the loan, enjoyed by the company or mortgages his property to creditor, to ensure repayment of the loan by the company, then on the failure of the company to make such repayment, he becomes liable, not as a share-holder but as a guarantor or mortgagor or both as the case may be."
9. Fashion Trust (Pvt.) Limited, a limited company, is the principal borrower and admittedly, no property was mortgaged by the principal borrower. C and D scheduled proper-ties were the personal property of the Managing Director and Directors of the company and they mortgaged the same in personal capacity and, as such, said properties of C and D scheduled also stand on same footing with the B scheduled properties mortgaged by the predecessor of the respondents Nos. 2-10 as because of all said properties are the properties of the 3rd party mortgagors as per the above ratio.
10. In the case of Abdus Sattar Miah vs. Bangladesh reported in 14 BLC 412 the issue of Section 6(5) of the Ain, 2003 was involved and this Court settled the issue in the following manner:
"In our considered view, this provision is applicable only when the properties were mortgaged both by the principal debtor / loanee and the third party mortgagor. In the instant case, admittedly no property was mortgaged by the principal debtor-loanee but the property was mortgaged by the petitioner. So in absence of any other property mortgaged by the principal debtor in favour of the Bank, the mortgaged property of the petitioner-judgment-debtor is to be sold to realize the decretal amount. Therefore, the Adalat was bound to sell the mortgaged property which was included in the schedule of the plaint/ decree."
11. In absence of any property mortgaged by the principal borrower, the Adalat rightly tried to sell the properties mortgaged by the 3rd party mortgagors including the properties of the respondents Nos. 2-10 in auction. Being failed to sell the mortgaged properties in auction the Adalat rightly issued certificate under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 in favour of the petitioner.
12. Present respondents Nos. 2-10, as petitioners, earlier filed Writ Petition No. 4792 of 2008 before this Court and this Court without issuing any Rule by the order dated 23-7-2008 gave a direction in the following manner:
"Considering the facts and circumstances we direct the Artha Rin Adalat concerned not to sell the mortgaged properties of those petitioners before selling the mortgaged properties of the principal borrower, if any at all."
13. Since, no property was mortgaged by the principal borrower, said direction is not in any way put any embargo upon the Adalat to sell the properties mortgaged by the 3rd party mortgagors including the properties of the respondents Nos. 2-10 in auction and to issue certificate under Section 33(5) of the Ain, 2003 in favour of the petitioner.
14. Therefore, the subsequent removal of the B scheduled mortgaged properties from the certificate issued in favour of the petitioner under Section 33(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 is illegal and without jurisdiction.
15. Considering the facts and circumstances stated hereinbefore, we find merit in the Rule.
16.    Accordingly, the Rule is made absolute.
17.    The impugned order dated 13-11-2014 passed by the learned Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Artha Rin Execution Case No. 28 of 2012 removing the B scheduled mortgaged properties from the certificate issued in favour of the petitioner under Section 33(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Annexure-F) is hereby declared to have been passed without lawful authority.
18. The order of stay granted earlier by this Court is hereby recalled and vacated. Communicate a copy of the judgment and order to the respondents at once.

Tariff
Add Rate

News Archive

Inside The New Nation

Editorial »

Govt incapable of deciding how to deal with Rohingya crises


NEWSPAPERS reported that the government is shifting its previous stance on sheltering one lakh Rohingyas to remote Bhashan Char due to constant objections from the international community, especially the aid agencies. Bhashan Char is only 25 kilometres from Sandwip Island and it has a fast siltation rate. There is also ...

Football »

Lewandowski double edge Bayern past bottom side Paderborn


Bundesliga leaders Bayern Munich squeezed past bottom side Paderborn 3-2 on Friday as Robert Lewandowski netted twice to spare goalkeeper Manuel Neuer's blushes in their final game before facing Chelsea in the Champions League.Lewandowski now has a league-leading tally of 26 goals in the top flight, illustrating his importance to ...

Entertainment »

Priyanka wishes Sophie a happy birthday


Priyanka Chopra has shared a sweet birthday wish for sister-in-law and Game of Thrones actor Sophie Turner on her 24th birthday. She shared a picture from the 2017 MET Gala where she not just made her first appearance with now husband Nick Jonas but also met Sophie. Sharing the picture ...

Sports »

Venezuela's Rojas sets new indoor women's triple jump world record


Venezuela's Yulimar Rojas on Friday set a new indoor women's triple jump world record of 15.43m at a meeting in Madrid.The 24-year-old world champion bettered the previous world record of 15.36m set by Russia's Tatyana Lebedeva in Budapest in March 2004.Rojas's new mark also left her just seven centimetres short ...

International »

Sanders condemns Russian interference in 2020 elections


Agencies :Bernie Sanders on Friday condemned Russian interference in the 2020 election, telling Russia President Vladimir Putin that "if elected president, trust me, you are not going to be interfering in American elections."Sanders issued a statement in response to The Washington Post's report that the Vermont senator was briefed by ...

International »

China's President expresses thanks to Bill Gates help for tackling virus epidemic


AFP, Beijing :Chinese President Xi Jinping has written a letter expressing thanks to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for the organisation's "generosity" and support tackling a deadly virus epidemic, state media said Saturday.The outbreak of the new COVID-19 strain has claimed 2,345 lives in mainland China and infected more ...

Entertainment »

Angrezi Medium’s song Ek Zindagi is all about living dreams


Homi Adajania’s upcoming comedy-drama film Angrezi Medium is about the lovable relationship between a father and his daughter. The chemistry of the relation is portrayed beautifully by Irrfan Khan and Radhika Madaan in the trailer and now the makers have released the first song from the fil titled Ek Zindagi ...

Football »

Messi sees 'strange' things at Barcelona after social media row


Lionel Messi said Wednesday it was "strange" to see Barcelona locked in a row over a company accused of criticising current and former players, including himself, on social media.Barcelona president Josep Maria Bartomeu said on Tuesday the club had terminated its contract with PR company, I3 Ventures, who had been ...

Editorial »

21 February should be celebration of free speech


THE historic Amtala, where Language Movement activists gathered on February 21, 1952 to defy a curfew and protest the then Pakistan government's refusal to recognise Bangla as one of the State languages of Pakistan is covered by encroachers.Pakistan government was ultimately compelled to include an article in the country's Constitution ...

International »

How Trump visit could leverage CAA and Kashmir against PM Modi


Agencies, New Delhi :As India rolls out the red carpet to receive US President Donald Trump next week, rough spots that have arisen in the wake of the Modi government's decisions on Kashmir and the subsequent passing of the Citizenship Amendment Act will need diplomatic resolution. The Modi government's sudden ...

International »

India ‘bigger problem’ than China: Michael Bloomberg on carbon emissions


PTI, Washington :India poses a bigger problem than China when it comes to fighting climate change, particularly on reducing carbon emissions, Democratic presidential aspirant and former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg has said.During his maiden appearance on a Democratic presidential primary debate in Las Vegas on Wednesday, Bloomberg said it ...

Editorial »

We need a caring govt: Mere court's directions cannot go far


THE High Court Division on Tuesday directed the government to ensure setting up breastfeeding and baby care corners in the country's all the mills and factories. Most of the working women have to resign from jobs or take an attempt due to unavailability of baby care facilities at workplaces. When ...

Cricket »

Host Australia target fifth title at women's T20 World Cup


Mighty Australia go into their home Twenty20 World Cup this week as overwhelming favourites as they look to cement their superiority in women's cricket and draw a world-record crowd in the process.Meg Lanning's defending champions, and four-time winners, were rarely tested through the second half of 2019 when they whitewashed ...

Entertainment »

Baaghi 3’s new song Bhankas is surely the wedding song


After wowing the audience with the action packed trailer and the groovy number Dus Bahane 2.0, the makers of Baaghi 3 have released the latest song from the movie titled Bhankas. The new track, Bhankas is a remake of Bappi Lahiri’s original song and once again is set to break ...

International »

Sanders hopes early strength will prove he can beat Trump


AP, Las Vegas :Terry Reece has long been skeptical that voters would back Bernie Sanders, a 78-year-old self-described democratic socialist who is just months removed from a heart attack. Then the Vermont senator essentially tied for first place in the Democratic Party's Iowa caucuses and won its New Hampshire primary.That ...

 
Items that you save may be read at any time on your computer, iPad, iPhone or Android devices.
 
Are you new to our website? Do you have already an account at our website?
Create An Account Log in here
Email this news to a friend or like someone
Email:
Write a comment to this news